On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
On 06/28/2012 09:16 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jun 28, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Jun 28, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote:
> Hi devs and Thomas, >> >> Just noticed a new commons-repository module. >> >> Could someone explain to me what is this new module and why it's not >> > part of xwiki-commons-extension, even though it's full of references to "extension" everywhere in it? (109 occurrences)
> > Since Extension Manager as an module to install/manage extension in >
has? is?
If you read the whole sentence it's actually proper english ;) (except
for
the "an module" of course).
Sorry but it doesn't parse for me…
You cannot have "since" and "as" just after.
You're trying to read it as a conjunction while it's used as a preposition.
Though I agree the way it's written makes the sentence not really natural to read.
Jerome
The topic is correct, but the lack of punctuation makes it harder to parse. Try this:
Since Extension Manager (as a module to install/manage extension in your application) and XWiki Repository (as a platform to distribute extensions) are very different technically, and are starting to be pretty big, Marius and me decided to separated them in two different modules.
But that is besides the point, grammar flame wars are not welcome on this list.
Yes you're right. I reacted because I perceived Vincent's initial remark as harsh on Thomas (not because of the remark itself, but because it was doubled) ; and since it was in fact grammatically correct, I though it was particularly uncalled for.
Just for the record and to close this topic, I didn't mean to be "harsh" to Thomas as I had hoped I had explained in my mail (twice). It's just that I couldn't understand it and I just wanted to be sure I wasn't misunderstanding Thomas. Case closed Thanks -Vincent
My bad
Jerome
I agree with Thomas that the two should be separated, since they serve different purposes. But I also agree with Vincent that cyclic dependencies are a big blocker. Still, I don't think there are any real cycles, since such a cycle would have caused the build to fail even when the modules were together under the same parent.
I don't really care if it's good English or not…. All I care is to
understand what Thomas is trying to explain :)
I'll assume it means:
" Extension Manager is a module to install/manage extension in your application and XWiki Repository is a platform to distribute extensions. Since both are very different technically and they are starting to be pretty big, Marius and I decided to separated them in two different modules "
In this case both are handling extensions which is the common point and thus I'd expect to see a xwiki-commons-extension module that only deals with what an Extension is and then have xwiki-commons-extensionmanager that installs /manager extensions.
Otherwise you've just created a cyclic dependencies: * commons-repository needs the concept of extension defined in commons-extension and commons-extension uses commons-repository
Thanks -Vincent
Jerome
your application and XWiki Repository as a platform to distribute >
has? is?
extensions are very different technically and are starting to be > pretty big Marius and me decided to separated them in two different > modules. The main link between them is that Extension Manager has a > handler for this kind of repositories exactly like it has one for > maven repositories (and more later). It makes easier to manage them > separately in UI tests, Jira,etc. >
Sorry but I don't really understand what you mean.
Can you give me a use case where someone would use commons-repository alone (without xwiki-extension)?
I don't understand why it's a problem to have xwiki-commons-extension/xwiki-**commons-extension-repository/ and what it changes for ui tests, jira, etc
I also see we have xwiki-commons-extension/xwiki-**commons-extension-**repositories/ what are those compared to xwiki-commons-repository?
Also xwiki-commons-repository-api is pretty empty… It has a class which
is
about REST and which should probably be in a REST module and there's
another one which is an interface with no methods.
I really don't see the point of a separate top module in commons. I'm probably missing something.
Thanks -Vincent
Note1: Its description in pom.xml is pretty vague: >> <description>XWiki Commons - Repository</description> >> In commons-repository-api it's even worse: >> <description>Contains commons stuff to use in a a client or a server >> > implementation</description>
> >> Note2: On http://commons.xwiki.org/**xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome<http://commons.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome>it's >> > not described either, nor on e.x.o
> > I just finished the refactoring on git yesterday... > > >> Thanks >> -Vincent