they are indeed very similar and with unimportant element additions. IMO they look a bit more colorful, but I'm ok with them. On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 16:20, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/02/2009 03:53 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Looks nice, posting here in case we need a new icon set at some point: http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2009-10-06-n58.html
It looks very nice and has 1000 icons.
The icon set has a very high overlap with Silk, the current set (there are a few missing and a few added), and with the same names. This means that we can easily replace the icon set just by replacing the current icons with these. Well, there's the problem that we've hardcoded "silk" everywhere.
The major advantage of FatCow over Silk is that it also provides 32px icons. Other than that, IMO they seem to fill better the available space, meaning that they look slightly bigger, and they look a bit less childish, although just a bit.
P.S.: It's FatCow, not FactCow. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs