Hi, Some summary of the expressed opinions: Sol1: -0 (GD), -0 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), +0 (Caty) Sol2: -0 (GD), -1 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), +1 (Caty) Sol3: +0 (GD), -0 (Vincent), +0 (Gabi), +0 (Caty) Sol4: -1 (GD), +1 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), -1 (Caty) Sol5: +1 (GD), +1 (Vincent), +1 (Gabi), +0 (Caty), +1 (Eduard) Sol6: +0 (GD), +0 (Vincent), +0 (Gabi), +1 (Caty) So currently the proposal that have the most positive feedback are: Sol5 and Sol6. Thanks, Caty On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 for 5 for reasons already mentioned and because I find it to be the most natural.
Thanks, Eduard
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Gabriela Smeria <[email protected]
wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your effort, Caty!
- Solution1: I think in order to see the tree, there are required a minimum number of clicks and this solution clearly doesn’t cover this condition - Solution2: it seems a bit hidden, IMO and also too many clicks, as Sol1 - Solution3: is a very good idea, but is not sufficient and also a bit hidden - Solution4: is too crowded, IMO a breadcrumb should be as simpler as it can be - Solution5: this is the best solution from my point of view, because it also preserves the old breadcrumb and it adds a new element, with a “home” icon which I think is intuitive enough - Solution6: same as Sol3 - really nice to have, but not sufficient
As a conclusion, my choice will be a combination between 3 and 5, or 5 and 6.
Thanks,
Gabriela _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs