Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
1) Image size ------------------
In the mockup you can see a dropdown allowing to set some predefined sizes to the image (inspired by google docs). I don't like the text "up to 320 pixels wide". What does "up to" mean? It suggests a range, but it means exactly 320.
What I had in mind is something we see in thumbnails, we make the image fit in a 320x320px square, if the height of the image is bigger than its width then the width will be 320px, but it'll be inferior otherwise.
I guess you meant it the other way around.
I think it's the only way to guaranty that the image will be "Small", if we just set the width to 320px then a 320x2000px image won't be small. WDYT ?
Yes, this looks good. It will take a bit longer, since the image has to be loaded and its dimensions computed in order to decide which is larger, the width or the height. But I still don't like the text. Can't we find a better one?
4) Preview --------------
I've put an image preview in the mockup, we've multiple choices: a) Drop it since it makes the dialog heavy. a) Keep it stupid simple, the image is represented by a placeholder and the 6 possible states are "prerecorded" (could be images). d) Make it an advanced preview, the image is the selected image, the preview takes the size of the image into account (by calculating what the selected size would look like compared to the page content in a predefined resolution, like 1024x768). +1 for a) (the first or the second).
The first or the second ? did you meant b) here ?
Yes, b), but if you look carefully, you might notice there is no b) in the text. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/