On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 14:58, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
+1 provided that it's shown in the syntax display name that this is still in an experimental state.
It's already displayed like this thomas.
Yes i know, it's more a reason why i vote +1 than a request
Thanks -Vincent
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to include xwiki/2.1 in the list of available syntaxes by default for 2.6RC1.
Of course the default syntax remains xwiki/2.0.
The rationale is: * Get people to know it exist and try it out as early as possible to provide feedback
Note that it's marked (experimental) in the syntax combo box list so it should be enough to let people know about its status.
Here's my +1
WDYT?
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne