On Jun 20, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on the great patch Evelina has made for the new xwiki administration. I'd like to take advantage of this to make some modifications to the default XWiki Preferences.
1) Browse Title Bar Text. ----------------------------------
* Current : XWiki - $doc.space - $doc.name * Proposal : $doc.displayTitle ($doc.space) - XWiki
+0
2) HTTP Meta Information -------------------------------------
* Current :
<meta name="description" content="XWiki for sharing information" /> <meta name="keywords" content="wiki" /> <meta name="author" content="" /> <meta name="language" content="en" /> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
* Proposal :
<meta name="description" content="$!doc.displayTitle" /> <meta name="keywords" content="wiki $!doc.tags" /> <meta name="author" content="$!xwiki.getLocalUserName($doc.getAuthor(), false)" /> <meta name="language" content="$!context.language" /> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset= $xwiki.encoding" />
+1
3) License ----------------
* Current : This wiki is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/">Creative Commons</a> license * Proposal : This wiki is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons</a> license
+1 but maybe we should say "Creative Commons v3.0" or use this instead: http://tinyurl.com/5jwj8p BTW I've used http://creativecommons.org/license/ to pick the license and it says v2.0 in the end... any idea why is that?
4) Version ----------------
What is this version? If it's meant to override the version.properties file then I'd be +1 to remove this field altogether since I don't think people should change it easily.
* Current : empty, actually it's not even taken into account if filled * Proposal : XWiki $xwiki.getVersion() - <a onclick="openURL('http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Documentation' , '_blank'); return false;" href="http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ Documentation">Documentation</a>
1) I don't think it's XWiki's version since XWiki doesn't mean much. It should be the product version. 2) I'm not sure about putting Documentation. I think I'd prefer putting a link to http://xwiki.org with the text "XWiki.org".
(An administration menu will replace the current Documentation link at the top right corner, shout if you think it's an error).
+1 Thanks -Vincent
I'm +1 with 1) 2) 3) 4) .. indeed.
That's all (at least for the moment). Thanks,