asiri (SVN) wrote:
Author: asiri Date: 2009-01-11 06:57:24 +0100 (Sun, 11 Jan 2009) New Revision: 15301
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-officeimporter/src/main/java/org/xwiki/officeimporter/OfficeImporterContext.java Log: XWIKI-3083: Develop the initial feature set for the Office Importer module
* Minor refactoring.
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-officeimporter/src/main/java/org/xwiki/officeimporter/OfficeImporterContext.java =================================================================== --- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-officeimporter/src/main/java/org/xwiki/officeimporter/OfficeImporterContext.java 2009-01-11 05:09:39 UTC (rev 15300) +++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-officeimporter/src/main/java/org/xwiki/officeimporter/OfficeImporterContext.java 2009-01-11 05:57:24 UTC (rev 15301) @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ import java.util.Map;
import org.xwiki.bridge.DocumentAccessBridge; +import org.xwiki.rendering.parser.Syntax; +import org.xwiki.rendering.parser.SyntaxType;
import com.artofsolving.jodconverter.DefaultDocumentFormatRegistry; import com.artofsolving.jodconverter.DocumentFormat; @@ -39,6 +41,11 @@ public class OfficeImporterContext { /** + * Default document syntax id. + */ + private static final String DEFAULT_SYNTAX_ID = new Syntax(SyntaxType.XWIKI, "1.0").toIdString();
Why 1.0? Shouldn't we chose 2.0 as the default? -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/