FTR here's some more explanations about the role of a CLA: http://julien.ponge.org/blog/in-defense-of-contributor-license-agreements/ Fiduciary License Agreement (FLA) are also interesting: http://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/fla.en.html Thanks -Vincent On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose the following: * That we start asking for a CLA for contributions (and also for current committers) * That we keep the process lightweight in order to not make it harder to contribute to the xwiki project. For this I propose to use http://www.clahub.com/
In order to understand why we need a CLA read: * http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/cla * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_License_Agreement
If we agree we then need to define our CLA. I think a good starting point could be the Node.js one: http://nodejs.org/cla.html
Now I don't think the CLA will have any legal value if we cannot define "the XWiki project" as a legal entity.
Thus I believe we need to start by joining some foundation or creating one.
I'll list some easy possibilities: * SF Conservancy: http://sfconservancy.org/members/current/ * SPI: http://www.spi-inc.org/projects/ * Create our own Not for profit association
Harder possibilities (need to change license, rename project, etc): * Join ASF * Join Eclipse (and be forced to use bugzilla as the issue tracker ;))
We also need to check if OW2 could offer that service of being a legal entity for XWiki.
Personally I'm tempted more by our own association (it's quite easy to create one if we don't need to accept money and a bit more complex if we want to accept money but still doable). My second choice goes to SFC.
WDYT?
Thanks -Vincent