Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
Note that I don't know what are the REST best practices. I'm jut noticing the inconsistency.
Ok. I saw what you meant. I modified a bit the resources to remove the inconsistency. I did this because attachments have also their own versioning. So you can access a specific version of an attachment either by requesting an attachment at a given page version or by requesting an specific version of an attachment.
To be consistent I only left the resources for referring to an attachment starting for a given page version:
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments /space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment} /space/{space}/pages/{page}/{version}/attachments/ /space/{space}/pages/{page}/{version}/attachments/{attachment}
I still maintained the non-verbose version but that can be changed if there is not an agreement on it.
However it might be still useful to expose attachment resources by using their own versioning:
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/history /space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/{version}
+1 for both (verbose): /space/{space}/pages/{page}/history/{version}/attachments/{attachment} /space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/history/{version} But this should not work: /space/{space}/pages/{page}/history/{version}/attachments/{attachment}/history/{version} Since we either want to see all the versions of the attachment, or the attachment variant used in a certain version of the document. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/