[xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Configuration based generic rendering cache
Hi devs, I would like to commit my configuration based rendering cache system before 2.4M1 for it to be well tested and improved during 2.4 dev. You can find details about it on http://markmail.org/message/tnggdulplm73cxm5 Here is my +1 Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne
+1 Jerome. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Mortagne" <[email protected]> To: "XWiki Developers" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:31:48 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Configuration based generic rendering cache Hi devs, I would like to commit my configuration based rendering cache system before 2.4M1 for it to be well tested and improved during 2.4 dev. You can find details about it on http://markmail.org/message/tnggdulplm73cxm5 Here is my +1 Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 Denis On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 16:45, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
Jerome.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Mortagne" <[email protected]> To: "XWiki Developers" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:31:48 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Configuration based generic rendering cache
Hi devs,
I would like to commit my configuration based rendering cache system before 2.4M1 for it to be well tested and improved during 2.4 dev.
You can find details about it on http://markmail.org/message/tnggdulplm73cxm5
Here is my +1
Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 Something which seems easy to implement and would provide the illusion of better performance is adding a second timer which after expiration, the page is still loaded from the cache but the cache is refreshed silently after the user loads the page. just a thought, you're the coder. Caleb Denis Gervalle wrote:
+1
Denis
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 16:45, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
Jerome.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Mortagne" <[email protected]> To: "XWiki Developers" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:31:48 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Configuration based generic rendering cache
Hi devs,
I would like to commit my configuration based rendering cache system before 2.4M1 for it to be well tested and improved during 2.4 dev.
You can find details about it on http://markmail.org/message/tnggdulplm73cxm5
Here is my +1
Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 18:15, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]
wrote:
+1
Something which seems easy to implement and would provide the illusion of better performance is adding a second timer which after expiration, the page is still loaded from the cache but the cache is refreshed silently after the user loads the page. just a thought, you're the coder.
Where do you mean by "after the user loads the page" ? At the end of the view action or in some daemon thread ? Does that mean that a page that is not viewed that much will stay forever in the cache because it's automatically refreshed and put again in the cache ? Anyway i don't plan to look deeply into it anytime soon, feel free to make a detailed proposal and implementation after i get rid of it in the svn ;)
Caleb
Denis Gervalle wrote:
+1
Denis
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 16:45, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
Jerome.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Mortagne" <[email protected]> To: "XWiki Developers" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:31:48 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Configuration based generic rendering cache
Hi devs,
I would like to commit my configuration based rendering cache system before 2.4M1 for it to be well tested and improved during 2.4 dev.
You can find details about it on http://markmail.org/message/tnggdulplm73cxm5
Here is my +1
Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 18:15, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]
wrote:
+1
Something which seems easy to implement and would provide the illusion of better performance is adding a second timer which after expiration, the page is still loaded from the cache but the cache is refreshed silently after the user loads the page. just a thought, you're the coder.
Where do you mean by "after the user loads the page" ? At the end of the view action or in some daemon thread ? Hmm maybe harder than I thought.
Does that mean that a page that is not viewed that much will stay forever in the cache because it's automatically refreshed and put again in the cache ? This would be a second timer which expired sooner than the normal timer.
Anyway i don't plan to look deeply into it anytime soon, feel free to make a detailed proposal and implementation after i get rid of it in the svn ;)
"patches welcome" ;) I only suggested it thinking it might be an idea you really liked. +1 for going ahead and ignoring my silly ideas.
Caleb
Denis Gervalle wrote:
+1
Denis
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 16:45, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
Jerome.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Mortagne" <[email protected]> To: "XWiki Developers" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:31:48 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Configuration based generic rendering cache
Hi devs,
I would like to commit my configuration based rendering cache system before 2.4M1 for it to be well tested and improved during 2.4 dev.
You can find details about it on http://markmail.org/message/tnggdulplm73cxm5
Here is my +1
Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 19:51, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]
wrote:
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 18:15, Caleb James DeLisle < [email protected]
wrote:
+1
Something which seems easy to implement and would provide the illusion of better performance is adding a second timer which after expiration, the page is still loaded from the cache but the cache is refreshed silently after the user loads the page. just a thought, you're the coder.
Where do you mean by "after the user loads the page" ? At the end of the view action or in some daemon thread ? Hmm maybe harder than I thought.
Does that mean that a page that is not viewed that much will stay forever in the cache because it's automatically refreshed and put again in the cache ? This would be a second timer which expired sooner than the normal timer.
Anyway i don't plan to look deeply into it anytime soon, feel free to
make a
detailed proposal and implementation after i get rid of it in the svn ;) "patches welcome" ;) I only suggested it thinking it might be an idea you really liked.
No it's more a "finally i will work on extension manager, quick, lets get rid of this thing waiting on my local repository" ;)
+1 for going ahead and ignoring my silly ideas.
Caleb
Denis Gervalle wrote:
+1
Denis
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 16:45, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
Jerome.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Mortagne" <[email protected]> To: "XWiki Developers" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 3:31:48 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Configuration based generic rendering
cache
Hi devs,
I would like to commit my configuration based rendering cache system
before
2.4M1 for it to be well tested and improved during 2.4 dev.
You can find details about it on http://markmail.org/message/tnggdulplm73cxm5
Here is my +1
Thanks, -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
+0 Thanks, Marius On 05/14/2010 04:31 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
I would like to commit my configuration based rendering cache system before 2.4M1 for it to be well tested and improved during 2.4 dev.
You can find details about it on http://markmail.org/message/tnggdulplm73cxm5
Here is my +1
Thanks,
participants (5)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Denis Gervalle -
Jerome Velociter -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Thomas Mortagne