+1 Thanks, Caty On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote:

+1

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:34 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]

...

wrote:

...

Hi,

Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on the reader you use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).

I propose to drop the RTF support without OO

Rationale: * If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server connected to xwiki * RTF is not really a mainstream format * I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export

Here's my +1

Thanks -Vincent

_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

-- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Hello, I remember wanting to propose this 2 years ago, but I can't remember why I didn't do it exactly :) So, here is my +1 Regards, Sorin B. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:

+1. FOP developers don't have the time or desire to maintain the RTF output, so it's unlikely to improve. RTF is a limited format.

On the other hand it is the only editable file format that XWiki can provide standalone. Some users do like the ability to get out a document they can edit, but I guess it's OK to only expose this feature when an OO backend is configured.

On 01/30/2014 08:34 AM, [email protected] wrote:

...

Hi,

Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on the reader you use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).

I propose to drop the RTF support without OO

Rationale: * If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server connected to xwiki * RTF is not really a mainstream format * I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export

Here's my +1

Thanks -Vincent

-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

+1, Thanks, Eduard On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea < [email protected]> wrote:

+1,

Thanks, Marius

On Jan 30, 2014 3:34 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Hi,

Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on

the reader you use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).

...

I propose to drop the RTF support without OO

Rationale: * If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server

connected to xwiki

...

* RTF is not really a mainstream format * I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export

Here's my +1

Thanks -Vincent

_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

---

devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs