Hello, I remember wanting to propose this 2 years ago, but I can't remember why I didn't do it exactly :) So, here is my +1 Regards, Sorin B. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
+1. FOP developers don't have the time or desire to maintain the RTF output, so it's unlikely to improve. RTF is a limited format.
On the other hand it is the only editable file format that XWiki can provide standalone. Some users do like the ability to get out a document they can edit, but I guess it's OK to only expose this feature when an OO backend is configured.
On 01/30/2014 08:34 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on the reader you use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale: * If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server connected to xwiki * RTF is not really a mainstream format * I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs