Gerritjan Koekkoek wrote:
Hi,
THx for the help. For me the option to remove the whole document worked best I followed following procedure; - Edit in the WIKI editor... - Copy Content to a text-editor (for each translation, already in the system - Action, Delete Document and really delete... - Go to page where a link to deleted document sits. - Create document (default language is now correct) - Copy Content from text editor into WIKI editor and Save (For each translation)
If you want to reduce the risk of this happening again, depending on how recent you XWiki is, there is an option you can enable in xwiki.cfg: xwiki.language.forceSupported=1 Then, you can configure a list of languages that your wiki supports in the Administration->General->Languages, and the wiki will force one of these languages to be used.
On 2 mei 2009, at 18:17, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Gerritjan Koekkoek wrote:
HI,
I have a page that should be readable for multiple translations. Currently it has a translation 'en' (for english) which is the default for the xwiki. The problem is that it also claims that the original version is '.' (this page is empty)
1) How can such a 'original' version have been created? (to prevent it) No idea. I've never seen this so far.
2) How can I remove this version, so the 'en' version is seen as the original In older versions of XWiki (pre-1.0) there was an input for specifying the default language. Now, you can only access that property if you know how. Try visiting this URL:
/xwiki/bin/save/Your/Document?default_language=en (replace Your/Document with the real document name). However, this may create a ghost, since it renames the language of the default document, while also leaving the existing en translation in place. So you have 3 choices:
- do this rename and live with the ghost - do nothing and live with the fake default - copy data from the en translatio to the default ".", then delete the en translation and rename the default_language - remove the whole document and recreate it from scratch
You should make a backup of your data first, if it is important.
3) Or is the '.' original 'good' behaviour? No, that's not good at all.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/