So here’s the story… There was indeed a regression introduced in 5.2 which was fixed in 5.2.2, see http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9652 Your wiki is on 5.2.1 which is why you’re seeing the issue. I’m releasing 5.2.2 today. Thanks -Vincent On 5 Dec 2013 at 19:15:47, [email protected] ([email protected](mailto://[email protected])) wrote:
Hi Patrick,
On 5 Dec 2013 at 18:18:44, Patrick Masson ([email protected](mailto://[email protected])) wrote:
Sending again as attachments exceeded size limits and my email was sent to moderation…
I received it the first time!
Hmm, Well I set that to "Yes" (see attached: "Admin:Email.png") and it does not obfuscate users' emails on their profile page (see attached: "TestUser.png”).
Actually I enabled obsfucation on xwiki.org yesterday and it was working. But I checked today and it’s not working anymore either…
Seems we have a bug.
Would be great to report an issue in jira (http://jira.xwiki.org).
Thanks -Vincent
Any ideas? Patrick
On 12/04/2013 09:43 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Yes that's the one.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Patrick Masson wrote:
Is this were the setting is...? Administration ? Configuration ? Email
Obfuscate Email Addresses This affects only the email addresses stored in object properties of type Email, as long as the default custom displayer for the Email property type is not overwritten. Example:[email protected]
On 12/04/2013 04:45 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
This is true only for a 5.1 -> 5.2 upgrade since before 5.1 there was not even any concept of obfuscated email and it's been made configurable and turned off by default in 5.2.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Dmitry Bakbardin wrote: > In this case it is logic turn it off for intranet sites. > But imagine the situation, when you make an Upgrade and then realize that > all e-mails are public :-) > Next bot search make you database open for everyone? Looks problematic, > isn't it? > > Среда, 4 декабря 2013, 10:38 +01:00 от Thomas Mortagne > : >> Note that this option also obfuscate emails for logged in users and >> not only guests (which is a pain in an intranet since it make pretty >> much impossible to find the mail of another user). > Kind regards, > > Dmitry