Hello Dan, I believe the Batik library is used for printing to PDF only, but I could well be wrong. You can use an SVG image that you upload as you would upload a png image. This will simply embed it within the html page and let the browser render it. This works since recent versions of XWiki (maybe 6?). I doubt this uses Batik. Isn't that sufficient? At least, to my eyes, this is a very important use case for all the technical documentation we write. Paul
dullfig <mailto:[email protected]> 21 April 2016 at 17:54 It is my understanding that XWiki includes the Apache Batik library to handle SVG content, so my question is why does XWiki not handle SVG content natively (without the SVG Macro), and why does the browser have to support SVG? With Batik, shouldn't XWiki be able to render the SVG without the help of the browers?
Dan
-- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/XWiki-SVG-and-Apache-Batik-tp7599123.html Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users