Hi Brandon, On Sep 6, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Esbach, Brandon wrote:
An interesting result... pdf's generated in this method cannot be printed (print flag set to false I guess). How do I tell it to allow printing?
Again, strange... I can print fine. -Vincent
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vincent Massol Sent: 06 September 2007 13:44 To: XWiki Users Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] PDF on 1.1RC1
On Sep 6, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Esbach, Brandon wrote:
Browser: Firefox OS: WindowsXP
The save/view dialog was there for 1.0B4; only since RC1 is it no longer a dialog. I saw a note somewhere about this a while back (I think), just can't recall if it was for PDF or RTF.
I don't know or recall anything about that. However it's working fine for me (I'm on Mac/Firefox).
-Vincent
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vincent Massol Sent: 06 September 2007 13:19 To: XWiki Users Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] PDF on 1.1RC1
On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Esbach, Brandon wrote:
Hi Vincent;
That worked perfectly. Minor thing, the PDF opens into the browser instead of the origional save/view option (most of my users prefer saving the pdf instead of viewing it) - is this optional, or the new way that it works?
I still don't know what we have changed as I don't recall any change since 1.0 that would have affected this behavior (but everything is possible).
On my machine I have the dialog box asking for saving or viewing the PDF...
What browser/OS are you using?
Thanks -Vincent
Current environment: Using the following: Tomcat 5.5.17 JDK: 1.5.0 build4 xerces jar on the lib folder: xercesImpl-2.0.2.jar
Not aware of any other xerces jar's in use; but it's possible.
From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 06 September 2007 12:37 To: Esbach, Brandon Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] PDF on 1.1RC1
Brandon,
Could you try this new jar? It should work fine although I'm not sure why... ;)
What JDK are you using on that machine? What container too? Maybe there's another xerces jar that gets picked up that has a slightly different behavior...
Thanks -Vincent