On 3/25/07, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Pavel wrote:
Greetings,
There is a number of ApplicationResources_xx.properties in XWiki and it looks like all of them are different (contain different set of keys). Both ApplicationResources.properties and ApplicationResources_en.properties are in english and are mostly identical except for ~70 missing keys in _en file.
Given that, I have two questions: 1. What is the "most supported" message resources file?
ApplicationResources.properties
Indeed, with a minor observation that a few entries in AR_en.properties override the ones in AR.properties. 1) When a key is missing it's looked for in
AppliationResources.properties. This allows any language to work even if there are missing keys. 2) I don't know why we have a AppplicationResources_en.properties as it's supposed to be the same as ApplicationResources.properties. IMO we should remove it
In theory, if somebody decides to deploy a wiki mainly used in russian, for example, he could replace AR.properties with AR_ru.properties as the default resource bundle. The, in order for the english translation to work, AR_en.properties should exist. However, maintaining two resource files is not needed, as if someone knows how to replace AR.properties, he should know how to create the backup AR_en.properties. In an ideal world (to be read: a world without Microsoft and Windows) AR.props should be a symlink to the actual language file. So, +1 for removing AR_en.properties.
2. Are all messages from .properties used in XWiki, or some are
redundant?
It's possible that some messages are no longer used.
Almost all messages are used, but in different skins. One thing we can do to ease the work would be to copy the current resource files into the dodo skin directory, and declare it as deprecated, so that we can move on with the new skins.
If the latter, are there plans for removal of unnecessary keys for
1.0 release?
Sure, if you want to help you can tell us which ones are no longer used, submit a patch and we'll remove them.
Note that we also have some work to do in the future on the message to use sentences instead of just words. This will allow languages not using the same word ordering than enlglish to provide a translation for XWiki.
Is there a JIRA issue for this? I remember seeing this, but I don't know if it was in a mail only, or on JIRA, too. Thanks
-Vincent