Didn't notice this one there... Might help to read all mail when out for a day ;D He does have a good point though, in that you should look through any attached code to see if any unexpected or odd bits are there.. The hard part, is knowing what will cause a problem and what won't. What I usually do in this case (warning: this is not the easiest way for most, just easier for me); is to start by blanket disable of all script in the page, to trace the error down to the closest spot. You can disable chunks of jscript by using the /* comment inside here */ method. It would be useful if you can put down all the modifications you've made to the Xwiki (even if just for yourself), as this gives you an indication of your own changes as well as a starting point for debugging. Do you have the script debugger installed by any chance? Sometimes this can help give an indication of where the error to start looking. It can be disabled if it becomes a nuisance (point of interest: a fair chunk of Microsoft's web pages will kick this debugger into overdrive). http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=2f465be0-94fd-4 569-b3c4-dffdf19ccd99&displaylang=en -----Original Message----- From: THOMAS, BRIAN M (SBCSI) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 02 November 2006 23:29 To: [email protected] Subject: [xwiki-users] FW: Don't click on the blue 'e'... Well, here's an interesting bit of news in response to my plea for help locally from a coworker who is a web developer. Any clues on where to go to remove this offending bit of code as a test, or reasons it should be there? Brandon: does this ring any bells? brain[sic] -----Original Message----- ... I know of no clever IE debugging techniques. In my experience, however, IE's crashes normally occur when loading embedded objects like applets, Flash, SVG, fonts, etc, or when people do some unorthodox trickery in CSS or scripting. So when troubleshooting problems like this, my instinct is to dig through the source to see if there's anything odd going on. (Having validating markup and CSS helps this process.) My first observation is that the page is written in XHTML, and IE doesn't support XHTML[1]. This isn't normally a problem, necessarily, if the page is delivered as text/html (as these pages are), because IE will look at it and treat it as HTML "tag soup", and ignore the non-HTML XHTML stuff as bad markup to work around. However, the site is also emitting an <?xml ... ?> prolog at the start of the page. This has traditionally caused problems with IE in my experience, because IE isn't sure if it should look at it as a raw XML document or HTML. This issue is compounded by the fact that the page isn't well-formed XML at all. (There are HTML-style <BR> tags in there, for example.)