For us it is very important to have it available in the next 6 release since it is a big part of our backup and portability part. I would really appreciate it if this could be done :-) Br, Peter
Op 4 jan. 2016, om 11:20 heeft [email protected] het volgende geschreven:
Hi Peter,
No it’s not been fixed in 6.4.x. Maybe Thomas has decided not to backport it since it could a bit dangerous? Thomas?
Thanks -Vincent
On 4 Jan 2016 at 11:02:58, Peter Huisman ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for the prompt response and great to hear that it is already fixed! I am wondering (since I can’t find it easily) if you also have fixed in the latest 6.x series since we are not ready to move to 8.
Br,
Peter
Op 4 jan. 2016, om 10:59 heeft [email protected](mailto:[email protected]) het volgende geschreven: Hi Peter, On 4 Jan 2016 at 10:55:49, Peter Huisman ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])(mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding the import of a XAR.
When we do an import of a XAR (exported with the History), we have noticed that - when the document NOT contains an attachment - the version history of the document is identical to the original (obviously as expected). However, when the document contains an attachment, it look like a new version of the document is created with the comment being identical to the last available comment. We have experimented with file an DB store (since we have multiple servers in use with different setups) but that does not solve this issue.
1 - Is this the expected result? 2 - Is there a way to work around this (in our case) unwanted result?
Thanks in advance for looking at this.
I think you’ve experienced http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9960 which we’ve just fixed.
Thanks -Vincent
Br,
Peter