2014-02-26 12:13 GMT+01:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
On 25 Feb 2014 at 18:58:00, 114 ([email protected](mailto: [email protected])) wrote:
It's a good idea to include such information in an ID but lack of sequential primary key for each page on the database is a design weakness I think.
I agree that offering a permalink for pages is important but this may not need a sequential id in DB.
As pages have versions, you could use any invariant from very first version of page to build a unique ID I suppose (like, hash of content). Question also is, would you want to have just permalink of a page (ie, last version), and/or permalinks on a specific version of a page.
Will it be included on version 6.0? I hope so.
In 6.0 I highly doubt it since I don't know anyone working on this. Unless you provide a nice Pull Request for this! :)
For 6.x, maybe we'll be able to implement the "follow rename" feature. However, changing the DB structure has not been discussed and is not planned so far.
Thanks -Vincent
[snip]
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users