On Jun 11, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Joe wrote:
Thanks Guillaume, Actually, turns out it's even simpler; I followed the "Preferences" page. If I get some time this week, I'll put up a code snippet for using it.
One tiny additional thing: how to define if I want to use vertical? The scriptaculous version supports this; and it would be useful to add this feature to the panel "navigation" - so that more view space can be easily acquired.
No idea about your question. However it's not recommended to use the navigation panel since it's very performance intensive. It'll load all docs in memory and for all pages. It's ok on small wikis but doesn't scale. The general solution is to create your own navigation as we've done in the default Wiki. Thanks -Vincent
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]
wrote:
I guess there's 3 solutions :
1. Recommended one : look at the class edition page code (I'm not quite sure where that is though, Firebug might help you find it) and see how its rico accordion was replaced with a scriptaculous one 2. Second one : check on the Prototype / Scriptaculous websites how you can build an accordion 3. Other one : copy a rico.js file from an older XWiki distrib (say, 1.3) and paste it into your 1.4 wiki's albatross skin folder (YourWikiFolder > webapps > xwiki > skins > albatross) -> I guess this should make the JS resources available again... Though probably at the detriment of performance.
Guillaume
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Joe <[email protected]> wrote:
I think it's a move in the right direction, standardization is good. However.. it still leaves me somewhat in the lurch as I want to use the toucan system (the page listed indicates this new project is a bit far down the line). Is there no method available in the current (1.4.1) toucan implementation for accordion style content inside a panel?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]
wrote:
Hi Mihail,
2008/6/11 Mihails Agafonovs <[email protected]>:
Why Rico has been deleted?
There's an ongoing discussion (search for "javascript framework" on http://xwiki.markmail.org/ for more info) on which JS framework XWiki should standardize on. AFAIR right now the choice is to focus on rewriting every XWiki interface using Prototype + Scriptaculous.
However once the Interface Extensions ( http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/InterfaceExtensions) will be ready I think you'll be able to plug and use the JS code of your choice for your applications...
[snip]
Hope this helps, Guillaume _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- http://wikibc.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users