DITA seems very rich in terms of tags. What I also find a bit complex is that it looks like HTML, it uses some HTML tags, but it does not seem fully html compliant. I think macros could work but probably only for a subset of tags. Using macros you can do {{macroname param1="param1value" param2="param2value" param3="param3value"}}content that can have more macros{{/macroname}} There is quite a lot that can be done with the params. It is possible to have close to anything in the param values. As for annotations, maybe Anca can help about what can receive annotation and what not. Ludovic 2011/10/19 jerem <[email protected]>
Do you have an example of a DITA document.
I have some we use here, but if I strip any confidential info from them only the tags will remain :D
I found something more exhaustive from the specs (1.0) about what can be put in the body of a topic: http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/v1.0/langspec/body.html
The "contains" part gives a good idea of the tags that can be managed. Of course the complete dita spec contains much more tags.
Macros are a good idea but maybe problem is that (as far as I remember) you cannot annotate the content of a macro (can you ?). Well, I believe I'd need to think about it.
-- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Extending-XWiki-collaboration-toolset-tp69... Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- Ludovic Dubost Founder and CEO Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost