26 Feb
2014
26 Feb
'14
11:13 a.m.
On 25 Feb 2014 at 18:58:00, 114 ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
It's a good idea to include such information in an ID but lack of sequential primary key for each page on the database is a design weakness I think.
I agree that offering a permalink for pages is important but this may not need a sequential id in DB.
Will it be included on version 6.0? I hope so.
In 6.0 I highly doubt it since I don’t know anyone working on this. Unless you provide a nice Pull Request for this! :) For 6.x, maybe we’ll be able to implement the “follow rename” feature. However, changing the DB structure has not been discussed and is not planned so far. Thanks -Vincent [snip]