Branch: refs/heads/okf-technical-id-format Home: https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-dev-llm Commit: c6d698989552d7349dd0abfeae1031612940ebb3 https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-dev-llm/commit/c6d698989552d7349dd0abfeae1031... Author: Vincent Massol <[email protected]> Date: 2026-08-04 (Tue, 04 Aug 2026) Changed paths: M .claude-plugin/marketplace.json M kimi.plugin.json M opencode.jsonc M xwiki/.claude-plugin/plugin.json M xwiki/okf/conventions/documentation.md M xwiki/skills/xwiki-doc-writing/SKILL.md Log Message: ----------- [Misc] Correct the xwiki.org Technical Id format in the doc conventions The OKF and the xwiki-doc-writing checklist stated the Technical Id as a bare `<groupId>:<artifactId>`, citing the generic Apply Diataxis page. On xwiki.org the value is prefixed by how the feature is distributed — `xwiki:<extension id>` or `npm:<package id>` — and the prefix is what makes the Extension badge at the bottom of the page resolve. The unprefixed form produces no badge. This misstatement caused a documentation review to report all 21 conformant JIRA extension pages as malformed, so the correction also records that an unprefixed id is the defect rather than the norm. Authority: Page Structure on xwiki.org, which the sources list now includes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]> To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-dev-llm/settings/notifications