Hello, I think that pages should be used for everything that is exposed to end users. From an end user perspective, there is no difference between a page and a document, so there is no point in using 2 different wordings. Page makes more sense IMO. Document should be used for XWik advanced users. -- Thibaut On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/10/2011 12:49 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
+1 also for page, for the same reasons raised by others
BUT : could we have it as a variable in the admin ? We could imagine situations where it is important for the user to name it document, and to name a space as "folder", or "application".
No, this is going to do more harm than good. What do we write in the documentation? Do we make 2-3 sets of screenshots to show the possible display variants?
More : as we have page type management, could we have generic page types (page, document, code, etc.) with specific icon in the UI ? Same with spaces (space, project, application, etc.)
Valid idea for the future.
Le 7 janv. 2011 à 16:53, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) a écrit :
Hi,
We are using mixed naming when referring to a document/page, not only on different pages, but also in the same context (Rename step for example). There is also an issue referring to this problem XWIKI-5401<http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5401>and we need to find an answer in order to move forward consistency.
So the question is which version we prefer: "Page" or "Document" ?
I'm voting +1 for "Page".
"Page" is more used IMO, especially in the "Space"/"Page" context. "Page" is more general than "Document" and better fitted for a platform
that
encapsulates all kind of content (not just documents).
Please cast your vote. Thanks, Caty
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs