Anca Luca wrote:
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote on how to handle the title behavior for the 2.0 final release so that we're all on the same page. Here's what Mediawiki (on Wikipedia) does:
- the document title is displayed using a h1 id=firstHeading - the content allows using =titles=, which generate h1 - by a natural process, contributors rarely use =titles= in documents
So I continue to think that we should allow users to enter = titles, and they should generate h1. There is no rule against a document having more than one h1. Again, the document title is in the <title> element, not in the <h1> element.
true, and this means that we could have the title displayed in a page in anything (<div>), doesn't necessarily have to be semantic, since its semantic is given by its use in the <title>. Normally, from the semantic pov, we should leave it only in title, but it's just that we need to emphasize it for the user.
Why would we put it in a h1 then?
Because it is the best element for the task at hand. It still is a title, so it deserves a heading element.
After talking to several people here's what I propose:
1) We remove the top level H1 only if the title compat flag is on and the title H1 is the same as the top level H1 2) The compat flag is off by default in our distributions 3) We modify the Toucan and Albatross skins to display the title (same as Colibri) 4) We modify the Default XE XAR to have titles for all its pages (and remove the header 1 in page content) What happens with dynamic titles?
This should cover both user upgrades and new behavior. Note that user custom skin will still work in most cases since they're not normally touching the contentview.vm file.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/