Hi there,
I observed the Annotation-code in XWiki is having problems with the general
approach of having a document-class rendered by a class-specific sheet.
E.g. the highlighting of text passages isn't rendering properly.
Is this a general limitation or am I doing something wrong with the
classes' sheet? It's more or less a listing of textfields fed by class
properties.
Best, Michael
Hello,
I have some java components (@Singleton) that depend on old core. It is
bad, and I'm trying to move away from it, but I'll keep at least one
component like this - my own bridge.
I have this in initialize() of these components:
ExecutionContext context = execution.getContext();
this.context = (XWikiContext)
context.getProperty("xwikicontext");
this.xwiki = this.context.getWiki();
I realize that this worked well in the context of a mono-wiki, but in a
subwiki I wonder if it causes issues.
Here, ExecutionContext relates to the request (user action) at initialize()
time, so I suppose it's a sort of default execution context, related to
main wiki, right ?
So for example when xwiki.getDocument() is called, it looks after a
document in the main wiki - not in the (sub)wiki from which the component
method was called, right ?
Should I just call initialize() at the beginning of every method that needs
a correct context, in order to get a "fresh" execution context related to
correct wiki ?
Or should I pass the context from the script service, adding it as
parameter to all needed methods in my component ?
Thanks,
Jeremie
Hi Sirs,
I am developing a macro in velocity (wiki macro) and need to use a parameter (wiki macro parameter) defined by the user in my java script code (java script extension). I tried can several methods but it is not working.
How can I do this?
Atenciosamente,
Eduardo Abritta
e-mail: eduardo.abritta(a)outlook.com |
Hi Walid,
On 13 May 2014 at 10:23:42, walid yaich (walid.yaich@gmail.com(mailto:walid.yaich@gmail.com)) wrote:
> I'm sorry, i'm so serious, we're more than 300 persons in the company using XIWKI, si i'm pretty serious, if it's possible to write a tool to migrate in 1 or 2 weeks, i'll probably do it.
BTW did you check the comments at http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XWiki+Publication+Work… ?
Note that this extension is NOT developed by the XWiki dev team, it’s done by some individual and is in no way supported by the XWiki dev team.
Also note that you don’t need this extension at all to implement a simple workflow in XWiki. It can be done easily with the notion of XClass/XObjects natively but you’d need to spend 1-2 days to understand these concepts. Actually these concepts are the main reason people use XWiki and they allow you to go so much further than any other wiki can go.
If you’re serious and want to build something for the long run, I highly recommend that you spend 2-3 days to get familiar with XWiki before making an impacting change for your company.
Some tutorials on XClass/XObjects:
- http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/DataModel
- http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/FAQTutorial
Generally speaking you’ll find technical resources here:
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/WebHome
> Maybe you're right, i didn't wait much, but i spend much time trying to make it work and i didn't even understand the concept of this extension, so maybe it's not well documented, in 1 days i get MediaWIKI with the extension work properly, but i spend 3 days on XWIKI without any result, so maybe one another reason is documentation :)
Yes that’s a good point. We always need to improve documentation. In this case however, it’s beyond our control since this is an extension contributed by some individual and is in no way managed by the XWiki dev team.
What could help would be to have a Workflow extension developed/supported by the XWiki dev team. If enough people request this, this could be considered indeed.
BTW most people switch from Mediawiki to XWiki because they’re quickly limited by Mediawiki on the “enterprise” aspects: fine-grained permissions, flat page hierarchy, LDAP integration, Office integration, etc.
Thanks
-Vincent
> 2014-05-13 9:18 GMT+01:00 vincent@massol.net(mailto:vincent@massol.net) :
> >
> > On 12 May 2014 at 23:59:35, walid yaich (walid.yaich@gmail.com(mailto:walid.yaich@gmail.com)(mailto:walid.yaich@gmail.com)) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > The reason is that we need a simple workflow in the wiki, the extension XWiki
> > > Publication Workflow Application not working.
> >
> > hmm that doesn’t seem a good reason to switch IMO… :)
> >
> > You’re going to spend 10 times more time writing a migrator than you would to make the Workflow Application work. AFAICS you’ve just posted an email about the Workflow issue only a few minutes/hours ago and you’re not even waiting for the response before deciding to migrate, that doesn’t look serious to me…
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > > Well, actually i need to move from XWIKI to MediaWIKI, but the most
> > > difficult problem is the migration
> > >
> > > Would you please give me any clue about the easiest way to migrate the
> > > whole content from XWIKI to MediaWIKI
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance :)
>
Hi,
Basically my need is to have a simple workflow, someone to edit a page and
another to validate and publish.
I can't get this extension working, i setup it on XWIKI 4.4 (5.2 too) and
try to run a workflow but i always get "workflow.script.failed".
Please, do you know how to get it work ?
Thanks in advance
Hi everybody,
The reason is that we need a simple workflow in the wiki, the extension XWiki
Publication Workflow Application not working.
Well, actually i need to move from XWIKI to MediaWIKI, but the most
difficult problem is the migration
Would you please give me any clue about the easiest way to migrate the
whole content from XWIKI to MediaWIKI
Thanks in advance :)
description: the wiki would be used mainly for internal information
storage and circulation within the student organisation body of our
university department at FU Berlin
owner name: FSI Philosophie FU Berlin
wiki name: fsi-philosophie-fu
We would appreciate it if you would create a wiki using the provided
specifications.
Thanks and best regards
The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of
XWiki <version>.
First version of the 6.x cycle having for main theme performances.
This version marks the move to Java 7 as minimum version and comes
with a new experimental Flamingo skin, new chart renderers, WebJars
support and many other improvements.
You can download it here: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
Make sure to review the release notes:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki60
Thanks
-The XWiki dev team