xwiki-users

xwiki-users@xwiki.org

10408 discussions

by Scrut Inizer

Hi I have downloaded the latest XWiki as eXo war and tried to deploy it. I was able to add it as portlet in the portlet administration. (Click on "import portlet" works fine). But when I try to actually add it to a container (Click on "add portlet") I can see xwiki in the list and also select it but then I get exceptions. (See the two screenshots I attached to this mail) Here is what I have done: 1. Install J2SDK 1.5.0.6 and set JAVA_HOME 2. Install the latest eXo-tomcat (Version 1.1.1 or so) 3. Install MySQL (the latest MySQL 4.1.x) 4. Create a user xwiki/xwiki in it 5. Dump the XWiki SQL script into it 6. Grant all privileges of user xwiki to that database 7. Rename the eXo download thing to xwiki.war 8. Throw that into /exo-tomcat/webapps 9. Download the MySQL driver version 3.1 (or so) and throw the jar into the common/lib directory of tomcat 10. Start exo-tomcat 11. Log in as exoadmin and import new portlets -> the folder xwiki with item xwiki appears 12. Log in as exo and try to add the xwiki to a container That is the moment where I get the exceptions as shown in the screenshots. Any ideas? Thanks scrut

19 years, 1 month

XWiki Parsing Error over top Menu bar

by e Box

Hello, Ever since our XWiki Systems Admin upgraded our installation to 0.1, the following error is displayed over the top menu that runs horizontally across every page: Error number 4001 in 4: Error while parsing velocity page Main.pageNameGrid Wrapped Exception: Encountered "style" at line 13, column 38. Was expecting one of: "," ... ")" ... Error number 4001 in 4: Error while parsing velocity page Main.pageNameGrid Wrapped Exception: Encountered "style" at line 13, column 38. Was expecting one of: "," ... ")" ... (etc.) Any ideas on how to resolve this? Thank you, eBox _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

19 years, 1 month

(Without the digital ID) XWiki Plug-in information request.

by Adrian Hall

(Apologies to those who got clobbered by my out of date Digital ID - I will not sign messages to the group any more - re-post) Does anyone have a more extensive Wiki plug-in example? I'm needing to do an LDAP directory application, and I'm lazy, so I don't want to do the whole UI. So I figure I can create an LDAP search plug-in that does: $results = $xwiki.ldapsearch.search("ldap://ldap.example.com:389/o=Top??sub?(cn=${text} )") Foreach ($result in $results) $record = $xwiki.ldapsearch.get($result) {$record.get("cn")} End . or something like that - anyhow. The idea is to create a list of names, phone numbers, etc. that match the search criteria. Unfortunately, the example "hello world" plug-in does not show off a collection, so if anyone has any pointers, I'd like to hear them. Of course, if anyone has already done this, I'd definitely like to hear that too. Adrian Hall Sr. Product Line Manager Technology Partnerships ahall(a)mirapoint.com Ph: (408) 667-4977 MSN: ahall(a)mirapoint.com Skype: adrianhall

19 years, 1 month

Re: [xwiki-users] disappearing xwiki

by wangwh＠att.net

Hi, Ludovic, Thanks for the XWiki! I was helping setting up Princeton Girl Scout xwiki site, the site was up then disappeared. (a few times) However, it is staying now. I didn't do anything special, but it seems to work now. If you can find out why, that will be great. Wei-hsing -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com> > > It might be because of the antispam gateway ? Which one is your wiki ? > > Ludovic > > wangwh(a)att.net a écrit : > > I created a site on xwiki.com, 5 minutes later, it disappeared > > (The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling > this request.) > > I did it again, the same result, the wiki site showed up with my editing, then > disappeared. Anyone seen this before? > > > > Thanks. > > Wei-hsing > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org > mailing list. > > To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-users-unsubscribe@objectweb.org > > For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help > > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws > > > > > -- > Ludovic Dubost > XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/ > Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/ > XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com > Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic > > >

19 years, 1 month

xwiki.com video error

by Raven Demeyer

Error found on: http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Company/XWikiForInfoSharing and http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Doc/HowToCreatePage?flash=1&xpage=plain The demo video gives a page with "There is no flash file". I use 1.0.8 Mozilla firefox with flashplayer plugins and Ubuntu I have never gotten this error before. -- Raven Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, All my base are belong to you.

19 years, 1 month

RE: [xwiki-users] Dead on-topic (was: Slightly off-topic: Digital ID required by some mail)

by Tancredi, Perry

Being in the industry as such, I feel a certain obligation to respond. It appears that this is only a problem for the emails that Adrian Hall is sending (sorry Adrian). All of Adrian's emails are encrypted. Not to get too technical, but if the recipient doesn't have the private key corresponding to the certificate used to encrypt the mail, then he or she won't be able to open the email. This is what Outlook means when it complains about not being able to find your Digital ID. The encryption is triggered either by the user explicitly asking for the email to be encrypted, configuring his mail client to always encrypt email, or an email gateway encrypting the message, so this may or may not be under Adrian's control. If it is a gateway, then the gateway can likely be configured to not encrypt messages to this group. Adrian, if you want help figuring out what's going on, I would tell you that you can email me directly, but I'm unfortunately one of the one's not able to read your messages. If you can turn the encryption off to email me directly... well then you don't need my help. Cheers, Perry -----Original Message----- From: Robin Fernandes [mailto:rewbs.soal@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 3:31 PM To: xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Dead on-topic (was: Slightly off-topic: Digital ID required by some mail) I'm using gmail and haven't noticed anything strange. Am I just not seeing the protected emails at all? Could I be one of the ones sending them and not even know? Will anyone ever be able to read this? :) Maybe you could post the names of the senders concerned (assuming you can actually see the sender field), just in case they don't realise themselves that they are doing this. On 26/05/06, THOMAS, BRIAN M (SBCSI) <bt0008(a)att.com> wrote: > > > Though I generally eschew "me-too" posts, I feel the need to pile on > here, and partly because it's not just "me-too" but a bit of a more > detailed approach. > > I am unable to open them, though it may just be a matter of > configuration in my mail reader. I haven't been able to find out how > it's done, though, and I'm beginning to suspect that it requires some > plugin or other that I don't have - which I would gladly acquire if > this weren't a fairly tightly-controlled standard corporate desktop machine. > > I think it's truly stupid of Outlook to refuse to open a message > merely because it can't verify it (and maybe that's the trick- find > the config option, if any, to tell it not to), particularly if it > thinks that I can't because it can't find my own "digital ID" which is > in no way required for verification, and I certainly wouldn't use it > if I weren't required to. On the other hand, if the message is > actually encrypted as well, then Brandon is absolutely correct that > the messages can't be read except by those to whom it was specifically addressed, which likely includes none of us, but > only the mail-list daemon. Fortunately it can store the message's > plaintext so that it can be read in the archive and in the digests. > > If the sender (or anyone else) knows, and can tell us, how those of us > with this particular affliction can read the messages (with the > verification feature off, of course, so we can read it...!), I'd > appreciate it, and that would satisfy me. And it certainly galls me > to suggest, or hear suggested, that a very valuable feature should not > be used because a significant number of people are trapped in a > situation where they must use inferior products, thus forcing even > those who don't use the monopoly product to do without the feature. > Needless to say, I have been galled in this way a great deal during > the last couple of decades, to see the strength of this argument grow > stronger with the monopoly and in turn strengthen it, so that the > predatory business practices that engendered it are almost not even needed to perpetuate it. > > So, if the message is indeed encrypted, please ignore the ranting in > the previous two paragraphs and stop doing that if you want all of us > who receive the mailing list directly to be able to read your > messages; if it's not, any help on how to beat Microsoft Outlook into > submission would be appreciated. > > > brain[sic] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Esbach, Brandon [mailto:Esbachb@tycoelectronics.com] > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 3:20 AM > To: xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org > Subject: [xwiki-users] Slightly off-topic: Digital ID required by some > mail > > > > Folks, a fair chunk of group emails the last few weeks have had > digital id control. > From looking over the last few weeks, these are the emails that are > less likely to be responded to, as I suspect they are not readable > except by a select few. I suspect the online archive is able to > display these messages fine enough, but to be honest (I'm not sure if > I'm alone here); unless I'm researching a problem before mailing the > group, I don't really go looking there for new posts. > > Suggestion: > If it's to a mailing group I would consider not using this method, to > ensure whoever has a solution/suggestion can reply to you. > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the > xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org mailing list. > To unsubscribe: > mailto:xwiki-users-unsubscribe@objectweb.org > For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help > ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: > http://www.objectweb.org/wws > > >

19 years, 1 month

disappearing xwiki

by wangwh＠att.net

I created a site on xwiki.com, 5 minutes later, it disappeared (The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.) I did it again, the same result, the wiki site showed up with my editing, then disappeared. Anyone seen this before? Thanks. Wei-hsing

19 years, 1 month

Boolean operations output

by THOMAS, BRIAN M (SBCSI)

This problem seems to be spotty, but in (at least) several methods that return a Boolean value, it is output on the document even when I use it in an #if or #set directive. In several cases, I have been completely unable to suppress the appearance of "true" or "false" in my documents. Is this a bug or a feature? If feature, how can I suppress it? Brian M. Thomas - Senior Technical Architect AT&T Services, Inc. One SBC Center, Room 24D3 St. Louis, MO 63101 314 235 3141

19 years, 1 month

Slightly off-topic: Digital ID required by some mail

by Esbach, Brandon

Folks, a fair chunk of group emails the last few weeks have had digital id control. From looking over the last few weeks, these are the emails that are less likely to be responded to, as I suspect they are not readable except by a select few. I suspect the online archive is able to display these messages fine enough, but to be honest (I'm not sure if I'm alone here); unless I'm researching a problem before mailing the group, I don't really go looking there for new posts. Suggestion: If it's to a mailing group I would consider not using this method, to ensure whoever has a solution/suggestion can reply to you.

19 years, 1 month

RE: [xwiki-users] Slightly off-topic: Digital ID required by some mail

by Filipe

I agree -----Original Message----- From: Esbach, Brandon [mailto:Esbachb@tycoelectronics.com] Sent: sexta-feira, 26 de maio de 2006 05:20 To: xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org Subject: [xwiki-users] Slightly off-topic: Digital ID required by some mail Folks, a fair chunk of group emails the last few weeks have had digital id control. >From looking over the last few weeks, these are the emails that are less likely to be responded to, as I suspect they are not readable except by a select few. I suspect the online archive is able to display these messages fine enough, but to be honest (I'm not sure if I'm alone here); unless I'm researching a problem before mailing the group, I don't really go looking there for new posts. Suggestion: If it's to a mailing group I would consider not using this method, to ensure whoever has a solution/suggestion can reply to you.

19 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

xwiki-users