26 Apr
2017
26 Apr
'17
6:34 p.m.
This P2 is much nicer, but I still prefer P4.
I can see why some people like P2 as it is more descriptive. But, P4 still matches the
current icons better (and I am guessing not many people have complained that they
don't know what those mysterious buttons in the top right are for.) Additionally
there's a tool tip when you hover over the buttons and once you know what the button
does, you don't actually need the label.
The icons are pretty universal as well. i.e. a Pencil indicates editing and a Plus sign
indicates "adding".
I don't suppose this could be a wiki wide configurable option? :) Or maybe something
that can be turned on/off with a class in the skin.
Kind regards,
Mahomed Hussein
Custodian Data Centre
Email: Mahomed(a)CustodianDC.com
http://www.CustodianDC.com
-----Original Message-----
From: users [mailto:users-bounces@xwiki.org] On Behalf Of Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
Sent: 26 April 2017 16:06
To: XWiki Users <users(a)xwiki.org>
Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] [Proposal][UX] Feedback for Explicit Content Actions
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Craig Wright <crw+xwiki(a)crw.xyz> wrote:
Hi Caty,
I would use the Edit text w/ pencil on Edit and just the plus icon for
Create. The reason is Edit needs to be differentiated from Create, but
this is accomplished with the word Edit. On small resolutions (iPhone)
I think it is acceptable to hide the word Edit.
I have to disagree here. The purpose is to promote and highlight both important actions
and that is both 'Edit' and 'Create'. The 'plus' sign can be also
confusing for new users. Highlighting just 'Edit' would be hard to justify.
The triple-dot icon needs to be a button. P2 has it as a free-floating
icon, P4 has it as a button: it needs to be a button as per P4.
Yes, a better screenshot for P2 is
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaLabeledActions/P2_n…
The symmetric P4 screenshot is
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaLabeledActions/P4_n…
Thanks,
Caty
Otherwise, looks good!
Be well,
Craig
On Apr 26, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Miroslav Galajda
<
miroslav.galajda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm voting for P2 because it is making the visual style of buttons
with dropdown menu to look as they should look, with indication of
the
dropdown
menu.
Secondly, the visual style of the edit page button will keep
consistent with the buttons for inline section editing.
Best regards,
Miroslav Galajda
On 26 April 2017 at 15:27, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> This is getting interesting since I know users that like the P2
> version
and
> actually it was one of the first choices for
re-implementation.
>
> I guess we need more votes to reach a conclusion.
> Thanks to everyone that is participating, Caty
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Jesse Bright
> <jesse(a)abrightfamily.com>
> wrote:
>
>> They both look great but I like the look of P4 better.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jesse
>>
>>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We had feedback that new users don't know where to find the
>>> 'Edit' and 'Create' buttons. Also there is some confusions of
why we have a 'cog'
>> icon
>>> that contains actions like 'Delete' and a 'three dots' icon
that
> contain
>>> other actions.
>>>
>>> Would be great if you could tell us which version you prefer:
>>> P2:
>>> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/
> IdeaLabeledActions/
>> advancedUser.png
>>> P4:
>>> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/
>> IdeaLabeledActions/P4_1_bigger.png
>>>
>>> Both proposals add backgrounds around the icons, the main
>>> difference
is
>>> that P2 also uses descriptive labels,
while P4 keeps the
>>> consistency
> with
>>> the top icons and a more minimalist style.
>>>
>>> For the more actions menu, we want to combine the actions and add
>> category
>>> labels, see
>>> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/
> IdeaLabeledActions/
>> moreActions.png
>>>
>>> What do you think? Do you have other solutions for your
>>> instances? Did
>> you
>>> encounter the same problem?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Caty
>>
>>
>>
>