........................................ I think the
html
of OO is better than the one of Word...
If someone offers a prize for the understatement of the year, or even of the
century-to-date, I'll be sure to nominate you, Jérémi. I quickly gave up any hope of
using Word's HTML output after one look at it, which I have little doubt is exactly
what they wanted.
And, of course, thanks for the link. We don't yet have OO.o here, but this is yet
another reason to consider requesting permission from the corporate watchdogs to get it.
I do have OO.o 1.1 on MacOSX at home, but I'm told that 2.0 will be a long time coming
to the Mac...
brain[sic]