It's stable from my POV. It's being used in production on
 On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Ryszard Łach wrote:
  Hi.
 Could anyone, please, give any info about status of filesystem
 attachment storage?
 Is it stable? 
 Caleb can probably answer better here since he's the one who implemented
 this.
 My POV:
 * It's supposed to be usable
 * We need more real life reports that it's working fine in production
 * We've received some bug reports already. Several have been fixed, there
 might still be some open issues. You could search open issues about
 "filesystem" on 
http://jira.xwiki.org to know specific details
 * One current limitation I know is that clustering is not easily done
 since you need to cluster the filesystem. This can be achieved with a NFS
 mount for example.
  Does it deal with non-ascii filenames prolerply?
 No idea. Caleb?
  If so - why in 3.4 versions default storage for
attachments will be
 hibernate? 
 Filesystem storage is not a perfect solution:
 * clustering issue mentioned above
 * it makes it harder to backup your XWiki system since you need to backup
 not only the DB but also the directory where the attachments are saved.
 It's nice to know that everything is in the DB.
 * the filesystem is one additional point of failure
 Ideally we would not need filesystem storage at all since DBs should be
 able to stream arbitrary data in a performant manner. In practice only some
 DBs support this (MySQL doesn't AFAIK).
 All that said I completely agree with your question. I'd also like that we
 answer it better and that we post this status on 
xwiki.org.
 So guys, can you complement/correct what I've said above so that we can
 get a correct statement about this feature? :)
 Thanks
 -Vincent
 _______________________________________________
 users mailing list
 users(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users