Since the original 15 were my preferred but the review has nothing to do
with the original one and is now closer to existing logos, since my second
choice 19 has not been review and integrated and that 12E is definitively
nice but too close to the original logo, the match is between 4A and 16B for
me.
Both have been improved well, especially 4A, and both could do, except that
I do not found the small icon and the "powered by" one really nice or
readable. Since I had to choose only one, I have finally preferred the
technicality of 16B slanted and its different versions for each products,
over the color pencils of 4A, that evoke for me, drawings, children and
games, ideas being not the initial purpose of XWiki :-)
+1 for 16B
Great jobs guys for these proposals, many thanks,
Denis
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 19:33, Trevor Russ <tr.wiki(a)telus.net> wrote:
Ah, it could just be due to the "printscreen of a
quick SVG". The "powered
by" buttons were unreadable to the point where if I didn't know what their
intent was, I wouldn't know what they were other than coloured blobs with
some white writing. I presume the final versions would be large enough to
be legible.
"Zooming in" on the screenshots show them up better, and while I like the
full "XWiki" logo, I find the Icon and Button "X" part to be a
little
thin/weak and maybe spread out. I don't know how else to describe it.
What I really like about 16B is the different logos for .org, Enterprise,
and Office.
Trevor
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:31:34 +0200 Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 04/09/2010 04:03 PM, Trevor Russ wrote:
> +1 16B.
>
> Although I found the "powered by" buttons for most submissions
(including 16) to be almost unreadable.
Any hints on how to improve it? What exactly is wrong?
Note that the buttons are not completely polished yet, this is just a
printscreen of a quick SVG.
> Trevor
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO