XWiki Syntax is a superset of the Creole syntax so yo
may think it works
So even if i would use that superset, it would not halt conversion, but
would rather damage markup (turn markup into regular text) ?
I think if such, that conversion should be prohibited by engine
Sorry but I'm not sure I understand what you mean
here.
The goals and expected features are different for different applications.
To me wiki is for quick and easy dropping and exchanging the notes.
Fancy style is secondary.
Fancy unique styles for different paragraphs is even not a minor feature but
rather a way to make noise more than signal.
Particularly - there is no place for custom CSS for it was not designed for
average human to easily change. I would not say about errors(or intended
harm) like white text on white background.
Wiki is not HTML and for that very reason Wiki is not CSS.
If the goal is to make cute-looking web application or system to make easy
editable cute looking user help, then full support for HTML/CSS is very good
to have. I'd even better supported LESS than pure CSS. But then Wiki
features would be limited. You just cannot edit wiki-style all that visual
stuff. You can never hope to get in Creole all the visual power of CSS3.
I think wiki interoperability and visual richness for applications are
diverging trends and they ultimately would be mutually exclusive.
--
View this message in context:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/disabling-xwiki-1-0-markup-tp7579990p7580…
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.