On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:22 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Uwe,
On Mar 14, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Connected Performance wrote:
[snip]
BTW: XWIKI is a collaboration space, isn't
it? But the user
communication is done through emails? Sounds strange.
Here's what we currently do:
- Discussions are done through emails and IRC because they need
liveness
- When consensus is reached it's either:
- Added to JIRA
- Added to our Wiki on
xwiki.org
What is wrong with that and what would you suggest to do differently?
BTW thinking about this it's true that we take the result to jira or
the wiki but there's one category that we don't summarize: things
that haven't lead anywhere.
For example, take this forum idea which we are debating. Imagine that
we don't go forward with it. I think it would still be useful to keep
a trace of that on
xwiki.org. Something like "Things we've discussed
but decided not to go forward with". So when someone asks or raises
again the idea we could point them to that place. It would also serve
as documentation so that any new comer will not be tempted to raise
again some topic (unless he's read the old threads and decided he's
something new to bring to the table).
I believe this is what is advocated in
http://video.google.nl/
videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 (How Open Source Projects
Survive Poisonous People (And You Can Too).
It's not easy to do and requires conscious thoughts but it's an idea
to get the maximum value out of any discussion. We spend energy and
time discussing something so it would be good that this energy be
useful to a maximum extent. This could make it a little bit more useful.
Thanks
-Vincent