Re: [xwiki-users] What would you like to see in the XWiki 7.x cycle?

Hi, Something I just met - as it's an "improvement" proposal I thought I

propose it here, but I may just create a jira if you think it's

Would be great if there could be an option, in Attachments tab at pages bottom, to display attachments as a grid of thumbnails, instead of just a list. The best would be to by default reach current Attachments view, when clicking on Attachments tab (because it shows fastly), then have a little flag, button, or whatever, to choose a "thumbnail" view. This "thumbnail" view, could be the exact same kind of view as proposed

Attachments Selector Macro [1]. BTW it could be nice that this {{attachmentSelector/}} could be used as

could rely on another extension that) merely displays attachments,

concept of saving the attachment name in a property in an XObject ...

Use-case sample: when you import a .doc document, all images are set as attachments with automatic naming. Without thumbnail, it's quite hard

to retrieve a specific attachment without opening all of them one by one.

BR, Jeremie [1] -

2014-12-10 9:46 GMT+01:00 vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>et>: > Hi Jason, > > > On 10 Dec 2014 at 05:11:40, Jason Clemons (jason.clemons(a)live.com

> jason.clemons(a)live.com)) wrote: > > > I have say, upgrading makes me very nervous too.. > > Have you ever tried using the Distribution Wizard? > > > so, I'd definitely vote for anything that changes or enhances that > process. So far, I'm terrified to even try an upgrade (currently on 5.4) > since my wiki is production and we've done a fair bit of customized > solutions to unique problems (likely not in a "supported" way maybe) . > > Well, first nobody should ever upgrade a wiki in production directly!

> should make backups and do the upgrade on a staging server and then only > move the instance to production. > > > My fear is that some piece of code or settings will get overwritten > which will break stuff and I won't know where to look to fix them. 😃 > > > > A wizard would be awesome to take the guess work out of it. > > err… The Distribution Wizard …. is a... wizard ;) > > You should give it a try! We do have some ideas in jira to make it even > better but it’s already quite good in its current state. > > > As is, I've read some of the tutorials out there regarding upgrades > several times but I'm not really able to determine the prescribed steps > using those. > > What tutorial? Could you give me the links? > > > I think at the end of the day I'm going to end up exporting my

> as XAR's and then try importing them into an upgraded Xwiki environment > too, since it seems easier to me. > > The DW is generally a better solution to upgrades. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > > On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote: > > > > > > Le 9 déc. 2014 22:37, "Thomas Mortagne" a écrit > > > : > > >> > > >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Guillaume Lerouge > > > wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Thomas Mortagne < > > > thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com&gt; > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Harald Ommang > >> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> Hi! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> In one way, I very much appreciate the relatively high

> > >>>> updates done by the XWIKI crew. You are doing a great job, making > sure > > > that > > >>>> XWIKI is alive and kicking and always improving. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The downside to this, is all the work needed to be done when > > > upgrading. > > >>>> So, I don't do that very often. The basic part of > > > installation/migration > > >>>> works very well, but when it comes to content, the upgrade > procedure is > > >>>> messy, as I see it. It is a hassle to have to pick and choose > between > > >>>> various parts when importing and exported XAR. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I would very much suggest planning for a future where the parts > that > > > are > > >>>> XWIKI software are clearly separated from the parts where

> > >>>> typically do modifications. Especially items like users and

> It > > >>>> should be possible to have a more separated export/import so that > you > > > GET > > >>>> new versions of e.g. the admin pages, while still KEEPING your > setup of > > >>>> users, groups, etc., without having to click on a million of > > > checkboxes in > > >>>> the import. > > >>>> > > >>>> I don't really understand this comment, doing export/import is > really > > >>>> not the standard way of doing an upgrade. In typical upgrade you > > >>>> backup everything if you want to be safe (or better you have > automated > > >>>> backups and you don't really need to do it when you upgrade), > upgrade > > >>>> the WAR part (if you use the Debian package then it's just about > doing > > >>>> apt-get upgrade or install with a specific version), restart,

> > >>>> upgrade the database shema automatically if needed and then you

> > >>>> the Distribution Wizard which download and upgrade the wiki pages > with > > >>>> 3 ways merge. Most of the time you don't have anything to do. > > >>> > > >>> Sure, but to benefit from all those nice Distribution Wizard > features, > > >>> Harald would first need to... upgrade to the latest version ;-) > > >> > > >> Distribution Wizard has been introduced in 4.2 so not really the > > >> latest version. And even before that export/import everything never > > >> really been standard upgrade process either. > > > > > > Sure, but you usually did reverse way : import new xwiki ui xar (and > > > remember to uncheck standard pages customized, or have them > overwritten). > > > And yes, it was sometimes a hassle, and compared to that

_______________________________________________ users mailing list users(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users