6 Mar
2009
6 Mar
'09
6:15 p.m.
Hi,
vmassol wrote:
As long as both syntax can be used (both wysiwygs are available) someone
will be able to create that scenario. I don't know if the plan is to remove
the tiny mce wysiwyg then its no problem. (just wanted to mention that:)
vmassol wrote:
I also don't think the second option is a good one. As i said the script
would be great for existing pages. But as long as the tiny mce editor has
this bug and is available ... you know what i mean :-)
Thanks
hel.
-----
hel.
hel(a)hel.at
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Syntax-problem-1.0--%3E-2.0-tp2430693p2436954.html
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Yes it's a problem. One thing that can be done is to write/provide a
small velocity/groovy script that scans all wiki pages and replaces
the heading with the wiki syntax.
That would be great for all existing pages with the wrong syntax.
vmassol wrote:
The best thing would be to make the tiny mce
editor create headings
again in wiki syntax:)
That will not solve the problem for all page contents which have now
HTML for headings.
The next best thing would be to convert html
headings like the ones
created (without class, or style information) to headings in xwiki
syntax 2.0 because i think there are fewer headings created
intentionally in html with that code than by accident through that
editor bug.
I think I'd prefer the script solution since otherwise that'll make
the converter heavier and with some hacks.
WDYT?