30 Sep
2014
30 Sep
'14
10:55 a.m.
Hi Caty,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Marius,
We need trees:
* for global vision/management: (AllDocs) doing crud operations on pages in
particular (but would be nice also to rename/move/delete spaces/wikis? )
* for navigation: in a panel that should list parent/child relation or
space/page relation for the current page/space.
* for selection: especially when doing import or multi-page exports
* for development: as you said a full XWiki Entity Tree would be nice for
applications like AWM, but we would need also partial Entity Trees for
Class or Objects Editor (displaying objects and properties)
* for classification: any category/sub-category or folder/page type of
classification would need a tree (Blog Categories, File Manager, etc. ...
tags, photo albums, etc.) when the structure is user/defined based on a
parent/child relation
Things to consider:
* multiple views: wiki/space/page vs. parent/child
* multiple parent: simple parent vs. multiple parent classification (maybe
in case of tags, photo albums)
Wishes:
* Normal:
** I would like that we could use a consistent tree
across XWiki
functionality.
That is the plan.
** I wish we could have operations on tree entries (by
drag&drop or just
from actions).
We'll have drag & drop and context menu (which could be opened with a
tap of a button on mobile / small screens).
* Ideas:
** I wish users could define their own tree structures
(not necessarily
having XWiki's two dimensions [parent/child and location] but maybe
defining a custom structure: example, I'm writing a book and I want to
organize the pages in chapters. Maybe I have some pages that I don't know
exactly in what chapter to put [orphan/hanging] or that could go in
multiple chapters )
I'm currently writing a generic tree widget based on jsTree that will
behave much like the live table: you define your tree structure in a
wiki page (similar to the live table results page) and then you
specify this page in the tree configuration. So you can use whatever
tree structure your want.
** Change the display of a tree from vertical to
horizontal (like a graph)
(could work for the book example)
I don't understand what you mean. Can you give me an example?
>
> Lacking:
> * Normal:
> ** Navigation panel (when visualizing a space or even a wiki we could
> display a contextual {{spaces/}} gadget in a panel that could be expanded)
> ** Documentation panel (of related pages displaying the parent/child
> relationship)
> ** Multi-page export with entity selection
> ** Groups/Users
* Ideas:
> ** Dependencies Tree for
applications installed with EM
> ** Roles/Rights vs. Inherited/Global/Locally set Rights Tree (kind of crazy
> I know :) )
> ** Major / Minor versions history
>
Not sure exactly what you expected people to answer :)
I tried to think of
all kinds of usages (not all are needed or realistic). Hope it helps.
It helps, thanks! The main reason I started this thread is because I'm
going to rewrite some of the trees and I wasn't sure whether I should
keep the current structure and behaviour or if you think there is room
for improvements. Since none one complained about the structure of the
current tress (the AllDocs tree for instance) then I guess I'll simply
rewrite them using jsTree.
Thanks,
Marius
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Dmitry Bakbardin <haru_mamburu(a)mail.ru>
wrote:
Hi, Marius!
I would add also
wiki > space > page > [anchor in a page]
in the WYSIWYG editor.
+ one more vote for:
1. wiki > space > page > [translations | attachments | objects |
classProperties] > object > objectProperties
2. parent page > child page
I'm almost happy with this macro:
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/HierarchyMacro
It has very important feature: EDITABLE tree - one can change order of
pages in the tree and page's parent by moving it "up or down".
I'm using it now as a "TOC" of space. This macro has few critical bugs,
e.g. http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/HIERARCHYM-5
Also I'd be completely happy to have an option "Blacklisted pages list" in
each and every tree/macro.
Kind regards,
Dmitry
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:04:57 +0300 от Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users Hi guys,
There are a couple of places in XWiki where we use trees to display
structured / hierarchical data. Are trees a good solution for data
visualization in those cases? Can those trees be improved? Are there
other places in XWiki where you would like to see a tree?
Let me review some of the trees we currently have:
1. Document Index Tree
wiki > space > page > [attachments | page]
This tree is also used in the WYSIWYG editor when you create a link to
a wiki page or to an attachment. It shows the spaces on the first
level and then under each space the parent-child hierarchy of
documents from that space. If a document has attachments then a
special child node is added. The tree can also display wikis on the
first level and then spaces on the second.
So it mixes two hierarchies: wiki > space > page > attachment and
parent > child. This can be confusing. For instance Blog.WebHome has
Main.WebHome as parent, but you don't see Blog.WebHome under the
Main.WebHome node in the tree because it is in a different space.
2. XAR Import
space > page
This is a very simple tree with only two levels. I don't have any
problem with it. Would be cool if it would show more information, like
attachments or objects, but it's a bit more complex to get this kind
of data from the XAR without reading the documents first.
3. Dynamic Hierarchy Macro (
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Dynamic+Hierarchy+Macro
)
parent page > child page
Unlike the Document Index Tree, this tree uses only the parent-child
hierarchy. You don't see the spaces but at least you get the full
parent-child hierarchy. This time Blog.WebHome is a child of the
Main.WebHome node.
I'm not sure it's better than the Document Index Tree, at least not on
the default XWiki documents, maybe because the document titles and the
way we set the parent in the default distribution is not very
consistent.
----------
WDYT about these trees?
As a developer, I would love to see a full XWiki Entity Tree:
wiki > space > page > [translations | attachments | objects |
classProperties] > object > objectProperties
As in http://imgur.com/q0br8xT .
As a user, I don't know. You tell me :)
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users