Vincent,
However your
point about maintaining two sets of documentation would be a pain and not a good idea.
Not sure I understood your point! :) Could you explain why it’s not a good idea to
try to have to maintain documentation content in a single place? I understand that we need
several ways to reach a documentation place and I agree with having a FAQ entry for this
precise example for that reason. However, I really think we need to try to have all
documentation about a given feature in a single location as much as possible.
Hmm reading my comment I see how poorly it was written--I was agreeing
with you. Let me try again...
"However your point about maintaining two sets of documentation [is a
good one, that I had not considered and it ] would be a pain [to
maintain redundant FAQ content as the technical aspects (and thus
possibly the user interface) of XWiki changed] and [thus my approach is]
not a good idea."
Maybe I am
just addressing the wrong problem. My issue was that I could not find the existing
documentation. I restored your version and just added "on how to restore deleted
pages/attachments.”
I’ve also edited a bit the documentation page at
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Index+Application
It’s now linked from 2 places I know of:
-
http://main.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/FAQ/How+do+I+restore+a+deleted+page+or…
-
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Features/DocumentLifecycle#HRestore (which is
the first entry I get in google when I search for “xwiki restore deleted attachment”)
Hope it’s now easier to get that information from the onset! :)
Always happy to be
the "lowest common denominator."
Thanks for your help!
Sorry to be a pest.
Patrick
--
|| | | |||| || || | |||| ||| | |||
Patrick Masson
General Manager, Director & Secretary to the Board
Open Source Initiative
855 El Camino Real, Ste 13A, #270
Palo Alto, CA 94301
United States
Skype: massonpj
sip: OSI-Masson(a)ekiga.net
Ph: (970) 4MASSON
Em: masson(a)opensource.org <mailto:masson@opensource.org>
Ws:
www.opensource.org <http://www.opensource.org>