28 Mar
2009
28 Mar
'09
11:40 a.m.
Hi Jens,
On Mar 28, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi Jens,
Schacht, Jens wrote:
Note that there's a parameter for setting the default to be XWiki 2.0
syntax for all new pages,
see
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/AdminGuide/Configuration#HConfigur…
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi,
I started testing XWiki Enterprise 1.7.2.16857 and have decided to
only
use the xwiki/2.0 syntax. Therefore I changed the appropriate entry
in
xwiki.cfg:
xwiki.rendering.syntax = xwiki/2.0
AFAIK there's no "xwiki.rendering.syntax" parameter, but:
#-# [Since 1.6RC1] Defines the list of supported syntaxes
#-# Available syntaxes are:
#-# xwiki/1.0, xwiki/2.0, confluence/1.0, jspwiki/1.0, creole/1.0,
mediawiki/1.0, twiki/1.0, xhtml/1.0, html/4.01
xwiki.rendering.syntaxes = xwiki/1.0, xwiki/2.0
This parameter controls the list of syntaxes that appear in the Page
Syntax combo box on the Document Information panel. You have to change
the syntax for each page you create if you want it to be in XWiki 2.0,
and from the wiki editor because otherwise the Page Syntax combo box
is
disabled.
Then I restarted XWiki and all worked well (Wiki and WYSIWYG
mode). I
think the syntax name was shown in the right column. That was
yesterday.
I doubt it.
Today the behaviour has changed. The syntax name isn't shown in the
right column. I get the old WYSIWYG editor. In Wiki mode the 2.0
syntax
isn't recognized. Instead I have to use the 1.0 syntax.
What has happened? Is there any solution?
Also I have a problem with the WYSIWYG editors. I would expect to
create
standard wwiki syntax using it (e.g. "1 header" or "= header").
Instead
HTML code like "<h1>header</h1>" is created? Why?
The new editor generates the proper heading syntax. You just have to
change the page syntax to XWiki 2.0 from the wiki editor. If you don't
have the XWiki 2.0 syntax in the Page Syntax combo box then make sure
you have it in xwiki.cfg:
xwiki.rendering.syntaxes = xwiki/1.0, xwiki/2.0
Hope this helps,
Marius
>
> I have checked all FAQ without success. The mail archives weren't
> searchable.
>
> Jens