8 May
2011
8 May
'11
11:49 a.m.
Stephanie,
the default content license, as written in the footer, is the Creative Commons license.
This is easily adjustable and is by no means mandatory.
The XWiki code (which includes some of the original page contents) is under LGPL.
They do not need to be equal or bound as far as I know.
They are two fully different licenses.
paul
Le 8 mai 2011 à 11:11, lists(a)yhmail.de a écrit :
Hello again,
I am unsure about the license xwiki uses. When I have a look at my
xwiki installation it reads: ?This wiki is licensed under a Creative
Commons license?. However, when I take a look at the FAQs
?http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/License? it says that ?XWiki
is distributed under the LGPL license version 2.1?
Is there a difference between those two? If so, which one is applicable?
I am asking because we have a customer who sells intranet SaaS
solutions for small and middle sized companies. The question is: would
it be OK if he integrates XWiki into his solutions. He does not want
to use functions provided by xwiki in his code/programm and he
wouldn?t charge extra for it. However he would alter the authorisation
process and change the style.
Thanks very much for your help,
Stephanie
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users