3 Nov
2010
3 Nov
'10
11:59 a.m.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean
<jean-vincent(a)drean.org> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean
<jean-vincent(a)drean.org> wrote:
No I think it could be more than that.
You could have spaces of type "Content", of type "User space", of
type
"Application" or "Application code", etc.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jerome
Velociter
<jerome.xwiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok I read too fast. If the category is here to be able to mark a space
as technical, I think it's like using a bazooka to kill a fly On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guillaume
Lerouge <guillaume(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for a better separation as well. I regularly give demos of XWiki and
> landing on a first page with all the technical spaces is indeed confusing
> for users.
+1 for a better handling of hidden items in the wiki.
I agree. Maybe it's time we thing about typed
spaces.
It could start with something light such as a XWiki.SpaceClass with
only a "pretty name" (quite needed too if you ask me) and a
"category"
list
We indeed need a pretty name for spaces and wikis (currently handled
in wiki descriptors). I think this could go in the XWikiPreference
class. Category ? Do we really need to categorize spaces which already
are categories ?
. WDYT
about hiding spaces to basic users when all the pages within the space
are hidden ? (of course the hidden page feature would need to be
finished, we'd need APIs to retrieve them for advanced users).
That would work.
Jerome
Thanks,
JV.