On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Stefan Bernsdorf
<gruener.heinrich(a)web.de> wrote:
Thomas,
thanks. I managed to build my thread as an XWiki Job and also managed to add
it to the JobExecutor.
However, my initial problem still persists.
I am not able to add an attachment to a document in this job.
Find the stack trace below. Looking at the source of XWikiHibernateBaseStore
tells me, it has something to do with the Execution context of the Job, but
this should be managed by the job executor, right?
This is my code snip to add the attachment:
XWikiContext mycon = (XWikiContext)
execution.getContext().getProperty("xwikicontext");
The ExecutionContext is initialized automatically but XWikiContext is
something else and you should never try to get it directly from the
ExecutionContext but use the provider instead as in:
@Inject
private Provider<XWikiContext> xcontextProvider;
XWikiDocument
doc=mycon.getWiki().getDocument(m_adoc, mycon);
XWikiAttachment att=doc.getAttachment(m_file);
if (att!=null) {
doc.deleteAttachment(att,mycon);
att=null;
}
if (att==null) {
att=doc.addAttachment(m_file,ins ,mycon);
XWikiAttachmentStoreInterface
ai=doc.getAttachmentStore(mycon);
XWikiHibernateAttachmentStore
hib=(XWikiHibernateAttachmentStore)ai;
hib.beginTransaction(mycon);
ai.saveAttachmentContent(att, mycon, true);
hib.endTransaction(mycon,true);
att.updateContentArchive(mycon);
}
This is the stack trace:
com.xpn.xwiki.XWikiException: Error number 3301 in 3: Exception while
switching to database xwiki
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.XWikiHibernateBaseStore.setDatabase(XWikiHibernateBaseStore.java:739)
~[xwiki-platform-legacy-oldcore-6.2.1.jar:na]
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.XWikiHibernateBaseStore.beginTransaction(XWikiHibernateBaseStore.java:911)
~[xwiki-platform-legacy-oldcore-6.2.1.jar:na]
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.XWikiHibernateBaseStore.beginTransaction(XWikiHibernateBaseStore.java:811)
~[xwiki-platform-legacy-oldcore-6.2.1.jar:na]
at org.centauron.xwiki.help.XWikiUpload.doCommand(XWikiUpload.java:68)
~[centauron_xwiki.jar:na]
at org.centauron.ant.TestScript.executeExtraData(TestScript.java:208)
~[centauron_xwiki.jar:na]
at org.centauron.ant.TestProcess.doPost(TestProcess.java:249)
~[centauron_xwiki.jar:na]
at org.centauron.ant.TestProcess.start(TestProcess.java:228)
~[centauron_xwiki.jar:na]
at
org.centauron.xwiki.job.XWikiAntJob.internalCall(XWikiAntJob.java:112)
[centauron_xwiki.jar:na]
at org.centauron.xwiki.job.XWikiAntJob.doStart(XWikiAntJob.java:98)
[centauron_xwiki.jar:na]
at org.centauron.xwiki.job.XWikiAntJob.run(XWikiAntJob.java:41)
[centauron_xwiki.jar:na]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
[na:1.8.0_05]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
[na:1.8.0_05]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) [na:1.8.0_05]
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: null
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.migration.AbstractDataMigrationManager.getXWikiContext(AbstractDataMigrationManager.java:282)
~[xwiki-platform-legacy-oldcore-6.2.1.jar:na]
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.migration.AbstractDataMigrationManager.getDataMigrationStatus(AbstractDataMigrationManager.java:406)
~[xwiki-platform-legacy-oldcore-6.2.1.jar:na]
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.migration.AbstractDataMigrationManager.getDatabaseStatus(AbstractDataMigrationManager.java:548)
~[xwiki-platform-legacy-oldcore-6.2.1.jar:na]
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.migration.AbstractDataMigrationManager.checkDatabase(AbstractDataMigrationManager.java:516)
~[xwiki-platform-legacy-oldcore-6.2.1.jar:na]
at
com.xpn.xwiki.store.XWikiHibernateBaseStore.setDatabase(XWikiHibernateBaseStore.java:735)
~[xwiki-platform-legacy-oldcore-6.2.1.jar:na]
... 12 common frames omitted
Am 20.11.2014 10:31, schrieb Thomas Mortagne:
Everything in XWiki is based on JobExecutor now
so I can assure you it
does not wait. Maybe your job is doing something slow in initialize.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Stefan Bernsdorf
<gruener.heinrich(a)web.de> wrote:
Thomas,
if I start a job using
jobExecutor.execute("antjob", req);
it waits until the job is finished.
Am 20.11.2014 09:44, schrieb Thomas Mortagne:
As indicated in the javadoc of JobExecutor all
jobs are executed
asychronously. You actually need to use Job#join when you want to
wait.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Stefan Bernsdorf
<gruener.heinrich(a)web.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have seen that the jobManager is deprecated since 6.1.
> But how would I schedule a job and return immediately using the
> jobExecutor?
> (Using the jobManager it would be something like :
> Job job = jobManager.addJob("jobtype", request))
> Thanks , Stefan.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Thomas Mortagne