Hi Caty,
I like the current P2. What are the drop-down options for Edit?
My reasoning for hiding Create is that the Create function is a little confusing to begin
with for new users. If you are used to files and folders, it is weird that a file is also
a folder (that a node can have child nodes that are also documents). This makes sense to
me because I am a computer science grad, but it isn’t that obvious to long-time
Mac/Windows users. I would almost want it to be called “Create New Child Page” or
something, to better indicate what is going to happen when you click that button. Except,
sometimes, it doesn’t create a new child page, depending on the template you choose. In
any case, there is no obvious solution, P2 looks best of the options provided. :)
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 26, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Craig Wright <crw+xwiki(a)crw.xyz> wrote:
Hi Caty,
I would use the Edit text w/ pencil on Edit and just the plus icon for
Create. The reason is Edit needs to be differentiated from Create, but this
is accomplished with the word Edit. On small resolutions (iPhone) I think
it is acceptable to hide the word Edit.
I have to disagree here. The purpose is to promote and highlight both
important actions and that is both 'Edit' and 'Create'. The
'plus' sign can
be also confusing for new users. Highlighting just 'Edit' would be hard to
justify.
The triple-dot icon needs to be a button. P2 has it as a free-floating
icon, P4 has it as a button: it needs to be a button as per P4.
Yes, a better screenshot for P2 is
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaLabeledActions/P2_n…
The symmetric P4 screenshot is
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaLabeledActions/P4_n…
Thanks,
Caty
> Otherwise, looks good!
>
> Be well,
> Craig
>
>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Miroslav Galajda <
> miroslav.galajda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm voting for P2 because it is making the visual style of buttons with
>> dropdown menu to look as they should look, with indication of the
> dropdown
>> menu.
>> Secondly, the visual style of the edit page button will keep consistent
>> with the buttons for inline section editing.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Miroslav Galajda
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26 April 2017 at 15:27, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This is getting interesting since I know users that like the P2 version
> and
>>> actually it was one of the first choices for re-implementation.
>>>
>>> I guess we need more votes to reach a conclusion.
>>> Thanks to everyone that is participating,
>>> Caty
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Jesse Bright
<jesse(a)abrightfamily.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> They both look great but I like the look of P4 better.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jesse
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> We had feedback that new users don't know where to find the
'Edit' and
>>>>> 'Create' buttons. Also there is some confusions of why we
have a 'cog'
>>>> icon
>>>>> that contains actions like 'Delete' and a 'three
dots' icon that
>>> contain
>>>>> other actions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would be great if you could tell us which version you prefer:
>>>>> P2:
>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/
>>> IdeaLabeledActions/
>>>> advancedUser.png
>>>>> P4:
>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/
>>>> IdeaLabeledActions/P4_1_bigger.png
>>>>>
>>>>> Both proposals add backgrounds around the icons, the main difference
> is
>>>>> that P2 also uses descriptive labels, while P4 keeps the consistency
>>> with
>>>>> the top icons and a more minimalist style.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the more actions menu, we want to combine the actions and add
>>>> category
>>>>> labels, see
>>>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/
>>> IdeaLabeledActions/
>>>> moreActions.png
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think? Do you have other solutions for your instances?
Did
>>>> you
>>>>> encounter the same problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Caty
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>