Re: [xwiki-users] reduce -Xmx after trying too large -Xmx?

On 03/17/2011 12:10 AM, Legeinfo wrote: Is all the data in the database important? You could try several things: - clean up the database (while still using the large Xmx) by removing unneeded attachments, cleaning the recycle bins, cleaning the attachment history table, resetting the history for all documents, removing the previous activity events; hopefully this will reduce the database size enough to fit in memory, but you'll continue to expose the problem to subsequent users that will create new content - continue to turn other tables into CACHED tables until it works - switch to a different database that doesn't load everything in memory but still works embedded (Apache Derby is a good candidate, and is supported by XWiki) - if you're not in hurry, you can wait for the 3.0 release and configure the filesystem attachment storage which will not load attachments in memory at all, but will still be a problem if the size of the database is given by documents and not by their attachments -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/