Hi Vincent,
2012/12/10 Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
Hi Jeremie,
On Dec 10, 2012, at 1:22 PM, jerem <jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I could workaround that quite easily, by adding the following in my
setUp()
method, just before retrieving my class under
tests from the component
manager:
getComponentManager().registerMockComponent(getMockery(),
LoggerManager.class);
But it seems to confirm that, for any reason, the LoggerManager was not
automatically mocked by AbstractBridgedComponentTestCase.
This is an old/legacy class and you should try to not use it.
I'd prefer not, but as I depend on old core I believe there's no
alternative ... Or there is ?
By the way I'd prefer not depend on old core but DAB was really too limited
for my needs. DAB is ok for very specific use, but for heavy modifications
on documents and XObjects api is a bit cumbersome. I wrote a component
extending DocumentAccessBridge for my own needs, trying to isolate old core
to very limited location in my code, but for now it's not "clean". At the
end I think I'll be able to remove AbstractBridgedComponentTestCase for my
tests completely.
That said it extends AbstractComponentTestCase which will register in the
CM all annotated components it finds in the CP.
The only reason it wouldn't register one component is because it's not in
the CP. So either you don't have that dep voluntarily in your pom.xml
because it's a runtime dep. You have 2 options:
1) add it as a test dep
It's already in xwiki-commons-logging-api, brought by parent
xwiki-commons-pom, in scope compile...
When you mean not in CP, you mean the component interface (with @Role) or
any concrete implementation class ?
I tried to add both (xwiki-commons-logging-api and
xwiki-commons-logging-logback in scope test) with same result.
2) do what you've done and mock the component.
Yes I'll stick to that anyway, but I wanted to make sure it was not a
symptom of something bad somewhere.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thanks,
Jeremie