The more I think about the more I like idea b) below.
This means there
would be 2 options for anyone wanting to contribute code:
1) If the person is interested in xwiki in general, the best is the
contribute it in xwiki's SVN itself and have the person be made a committer
2) if the person is interested only in a specific thing, like a macro he
has developed, a plugin, an app, and is looking for a place where he/she
can contribute with others on it, then this special forge project is the
perfect place.
Now we need to find a name for it and then creating it is quick and easy.
I propose to name it "xlet" which means an xwiki extension in general.
Any other idea?
xlet is already used for Digital TV 'lets.
wiklet is already used as the name of another wiki engine.
walet (wiki application-let) is free. Sounds too much like wallet.
wlet is free, but doesn't sound so good.
xwlet is free, but how does one pronounce it?
I like xlet and wiklet... Can we use one of them although they are
already used for something else? I guess xlet is not possible, as it is
used by Sun in the JavaTV specification. Probably trademarked.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: for those who are maven afficionado, this is equivalent to the mojo
project at codehaus.
On Feb 20, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
>> Alan, Ricardo,
>>
>> what's on
i2geo.net will be published soon. It's just a macro and a
>> javascript embedding and uses the MathTran server.
>>
>> The syntax? real LaTeX, which is indeed running at
mathtran.org. No
>> own macros though.
>> That also means it's full LaTeX contrary to most latex-imitators (but
>> which, often, can do mathml for example).
>>
>> We should be announcing this in a few days... probably starting as a
>> jira issue that contains the jar.
>>
>> It may take a fair more time to get high-quality printouts though...
>> i.e. either that someone works on the print-channel-through tex
>> (which is fragile because tex is a very old system) or that we work
>> out on the dvi inclusion in the print channel.
>>
>> Would there be a better space to publish these ?
>> we could start a project on our libresource forge, but maybe the
>> XWiki folks team has a better place?
>
> 1) For publishing the jar, the best is probably the xwiki code zone
> 2) For the source code, it really depends on you. You have 3 options I
> can think of:
>
> a) a project wherever you want (sourceforge, libresource, etc)
>
> b) a project on the XWiki Forge. This is not advertised yet but we
> have a XWiki Forge for hosting projects related to XWiki. We give
> those projects a SVN repo, a wiki (as in http://<project
>
name>.xwiki.org)rg), a JIRA project, mailing lists, etc. Note that since
> the machines and admin are currently owned and done by XWiki SAS, it's
> its decision to decide what project get in. This project would
> definitely fit in.
>
> Since maybe creating a project just for one macro would be a bit too
> much, we could create a general purpose project for hosting outside
> contributions (plugins, macros, applications). Actually I think this
> would be a very good idea. It would be very open and anyone asking
> would get commit access to it.
>
> c) you're interested in participating to the xwiki development and in
> this case we include your macro in the xwiki source code and we vote
> you in as a committer to improve and support it (of course that would
> be after seeing the source code and ensuring it complies with the
> xwiki coding conventions, etc).
>
> Let us know what you'd prefer.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Le 20 févr. 08 à 10:17, <A.Aqrawi(a)iaea.org
>> <mailto:A.Aqrawi@iaea.org>> a écrit :
>>
>>> Oh thanks ricardo - that was quick
>>>
>>> I think the MathTran should be good for now....until maybe something
>>> in-editor is developed
>>> Do you have experience with MathTran and linking it to the page?
>>> Does it work good and project all LaTex formulae?
>>>
>>> That would be good to know, before i go out there and tell everybody
>>> i have a solution :-).
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> From: users-bounces(a)xwiki.org <mailto:users-bounces@xwiki.org>
>>> [mailto:users-bounces@xwiki.org] On Behalf Of [Ricardo Rodriguez]
>>> Your EPEC Network ICT Team
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2008 09:57
>>> To: XWiki Users
>>> Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Latex html in editor for math formulas?
>>>
>>> A.Aqrawi(a)iaea.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> Will there be an additional button in the editor, to implement
>>>> formulas?
>>>> Or is there?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You must be aware of this...
>>>
>>>
http://i2geo.net/bin/Sandbox/Formulae
>>>
>>> There is at least a thread in xwiki-devs dealing with this issue.
>>> Look for MathTran there.
>>>
>>>
http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=2564&local=y&query=Mat…
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>>
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>