19 Sep
2009
19 Sep
'09
11:13 p.m.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 23:09, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
we
are targeting just the issues in the CORE? there are lots of
trivial
issues in other components.
See my previous mail. I mentioned the need to have the difficulty
custom field in other jira projects too...
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Sep 19, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote:
The idea is that if it's a user submitted issue, the user might not know the
difficulty of the issue and he will just mark it with the tag. If the
developer comes and marks it difficult, we still know that the user though
that the issue needed attention and raises an usability problem.
Hi,
I think this initiative is great and will help improved our UX.
The paper cut issues could be great for anyone wanting to start
participating in open source and want a small bug to fix (like GSOC
students
:p )
Related jira issues could be just linked to this jira task.
Instead of linking them we could tag them with paperCut, maybe we
like this
approach better.
User could tag the issues with paperCut and developers should rate the
issue's difficulty and priority.
I don't see the difference between a "papercut" tag and the
"trivial"
difficulty. Could you explain?
Regarding
> Trivial:
>
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&request…