9 Apr
2010
9 Apr
'10
7:33 p.m.
Ah, it could just be due to the "printscreen of a quick SVG". The "powered
by" buttons were unreadable to the point where if I didn't know what their intent
was, I wouldn't know what they were other than coloured blobs with some white writing.
I presume the final versions would be large enough to be legible.
"Zooming in" on the screenshots show them up better, and while I like the full
"XWiki" logo, I find the Icon and Button "X" part to be a little
thin/weak and maybe spread out. I don't know how else to describe it.
What I really like about 16B is the different logos for .org, Enterprise, and Office.
Trevor
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:31:34 +0200 Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 04/09/2010 04:03 PM, Trevor Russ wrote:
+1 16B.
Although I found the "powered by" buttons for most submissions (including 16)
to be almost unreadable.
Any hints on how to improve it? What exactly is wrong?
Note that the buttons are not completely polished yet, this is just a
printscreen of a quick SVG.
> Trevor