14 Apr
2010
14 Apr
'10
9:50 a.m.
IMO it's a bit too late to give -1 for a logo that passed the first
round. Is it less readable now?
16 was voted by 11 community members (including myself) in the first
round. Do we count less than "people from outside the project"? If we
want a community-chosen logo then we should let the community choose. If
we want a logo that is good for marketing then we should find a branding
company to do it for us.
Thanks,
Marius
I completely agree with Marius, I would also add that since this is a
Community project, it should have a Community logo !
Since 16 has receive many votes now, and that I also agree with Vincent,
Ludovic and others, it is not readable enough, I have made an alternative
design: W-angle. My feeling was that the W is difficult to read, so my
proposal try to keep the style and reworked it. There is also small changes
in spacing, and a different powered by button.
Here is almost all that was requested in a proposal with this variable:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16%2D…
I really hope that if the logo 16 is chosen, my proposal could help in
mitigating the disappointment of those that really find it unacceptable.
WDYT ?
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
