13 Apr
2010
13 Apr
'10
noon
Hi,
I think version 16 is the ONLY original logo we have for this challenge.
It is abstract enough to make a great brand and be reused for variations.
It is simple, straightforward and easily to remember (not to reproduce, to
remember that you've seen it before).
It's look IMO is perfect for a technical application and community.
It's smart, creative and I LOVE IT :)
Go version 16 :)
Caty
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:41, Fabio Mancinelli
<fabio.mancinelli(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
had
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
arm..
I can't read XWiki in it..
I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovic's feeling. I people from outside the project look at the 16
logo and they weren't able
to
read "XWiki" in it. I'm afraid that
while stylistically interesting, this
logo is too unreadable for mainstream use - unless we don't expect anyone
to
understand the XWiki logo that is.
I'm feeling pretty close to giving it a -1 too if its readability isn't
improved. I know I might be going against the flow here but we're about
to
make a significant choice here and I don't
want us to regret it.
Any thoughts?
Guillaume
I share your opinion... Besides the fact that I don't like it because
it's
miles away from the "web 2.0" style that I think we tend to.
It would be good if our style was "geeky-oldschool" but I don't think
it's
the case.
But this is a personal and questionable opinion.
The fact is that me too, at a first glance, I can't read XWiki in it and I
have to make an effort in order to "see" XWiki written in that logo.
My 2 cents,
Fabio
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users